Suppr超能文献

短脉冲电休克疗法和正弦波电休克疗法的效果一样吗?

Are brief pulse and sine wave ECT equally efficient?

作者信息

Fox H A, Rosen A, Campbell R J

机构信息

Gracie Square Hospital, New York, NY 10021.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;50(11):432-5.

PMID:2808311
Abstract

The literature reflects that brief pulse electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) uses less energy to elicit seizures and produces less cognitive disturbance than does sine wave ECT. However, the relative effectiveness and efficiency of the two waveforms have not been firmly established. In an effort to clarify these issues, the authors retrospectively compared a diagnostically heterogeneous group of 197 patients who received sine wave ECT with a similar group of 144 patients who received brief pulse ECT. The average number of ECT treatments administered to each group was essentially the same. Among a more homogeneous group of patients with affective disorders treated with either bilateral or mixed electrode placements, the number of treatments required with each waveform did not differ significantly.

摘要

文献表明,与正弦波电休克疗法相比,短暂脉冲电休克疗法(ECT)引发癫痫发作所需的能量更少,产生的认知障碍也更少。然而,这两种波形的相对有效性和效率尚未得到确切证实。为了阐明这些问题,作者回顾性地比较了197例接受正弦波ECT的诊断异质性患者组与144例接受短暂脉冲ECT的类似患者组。每组接受ECT治疗的平均次数基本相同。在使用双侧或混合电极放置治疗的情感障碍患者这一更为同质的患者组中,每种波形所需的治疗次数没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验