Fox H A, Rosen A, Campbell R J
Gracie Square Hospital, New York, NY 10021.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;50(11):432-5.
The literature reflects that brief pulse electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) uses less energy to elicit seizures and produces less cognitive disturbance than does sine wave ECT. However, the relative effectiveness and efficiency of the two waveforms have not been firmly established. In an effort to clarify these issues, the authors retrospectively compared a diagnostically heterogeneous group of 197 patients who received sine wave ECT with a similar group of 144 patients who received brief pulse ECT. The average number of ECT treatments administered to each group was essentially the same. Among a more homogeneous group of patients with affective disorders treated with either bilateral or mixed electrode placements, the number of treatments required with each waveform did not differ significantly.
文献表明,与正弦波电休克疗法相比,短暂脉冲电休克疗法(ECT)引发癫痫发作所需的能量更少,产生的认知障碍也更少。然而,这两种波形的相对有效性和效率尚未得到确切证实。为了阐明这些问题,作者回顾性地比较了197例接受正弦波ECT的诊断异质性患者组与144例接受短暂脉冲ECT的类似患者组。每组接受ECT治疗的平均次数基本相同。在使用双侧或混合电极放置治疗的情感障碍患者这一更为同质的患者组中,每种波形所需的治疗次数没有显著差异。