Masood Mohd, Suominen Anna L, Pietila Terttu, Lahti Satu
Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.
Department of Community Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;45(2):178-188. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12276. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
The aim of this study was to examine the association of increased overjet, cross-bite/scissor-bite and increased overbite/open bite with oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among Finnish adults using nationally representative data.
Part of the data from the Health 2000 Survey, Finland, was used in this study. A total of 4711 people were included, representing adults aged ≥30 years. The outcome variable was OHRQoL severity which was measured using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Three malocclusion traits (increased overjet, cross-bite/scissor-bite and increased overbite/open bite) were used as explanatory variables. Age group, marital status, education level, income, employment status, having at least one decayed tooth or periodontal pocket ≥6 mm, the number of contacting pairs of teeth, denture status and self-reported general health status were controlled for. A series of multivariable zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP) models were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR) for the nonzero scores and odds ratios (OR) of having no event.
The weighted prevalence of increased overjet was 8.4%, while it was 23.6% for cross-bite/scissor-bite and 6.7% for increased overbite/open bite. The mean (SE) OHIP-14 (OHRQoL severity) was 2.8 (0.92); the mean score was highest in the pain domain and lowest in the physical and social disability domains. The mean OHIP-14 score was higher in people with increased overjet but not significantly different in people with cross-bite/scissor-bite or with increased overbite/open bite. In multivariate ZIP models, people with increased overjet had a 10% higher OHIP-14 score than people with normal overjet. Increased overjet was associated only with the physical disability domain. Cross-bite/scissor-bite was associated only with the social disability domain, and psychological disability was associated with increased overbite/open bite.
People with increased overjet had significantly poorer OHRQoL than people with normal overjet in a nationally representative population of Finnish adults ≥30 years. Other malocclusion traits were not associated with OHRQoL. However, all three malocclusion traits were associated with either physical or psychological or social disability domains of the OHRQoL.
本研究旨在利用具有全国代表性的数据,调查芬兰成年人中覆盖过大、反合/剪式咬合以及覆合加深/开合与口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)之间的关联。
本研究使用了芬兰健康2000调查的部分数据。共纳入4711人,均为年龄≥30岁的成年人。结果变量为OHRQoL严重程度,采用14项口腔健康影响量表(OHIP-14)进行测量。三种错颌特征(覆盖过大、反合/剪式咬合以及覆合加深/开合)用作解释变量。对年龄组、婚姻状况、教育水平、收入、就业状况、至少有一颗龋齿或牙周袋≥6mm、接触牙对数量、义齿状况以及自我报告的总体健康状况进行了控制。使用一系列多变量零膨胀泊松(ZIP)模型计算非零分数的发病率比(IRR)以及无事件发生的比值比(OR)。
覆盖过大的加权患病率为8.4%,反合/剪式咬合为23.6%,覆合加深/开合为6.7%。OHIP-14(OHRQoL严重程度)的均值(标准误)为2.8(0.92);平均得分在疼痛领域最高,在身体和社会功能障碍领域最低。覆盖过大者的OHIP-14平均得分较高,但反合/剪式咬合者或覆合加深/开合者的得分无显著差异。在多变量ZIP模型中,覆盖过大者的OHIP-14得分比正常覆盖者高10%。覆盖过大仅与身体功能障碍领域相关。反合/剪式咬合仅与社会功能障碍领域相关,而心理功能障碍与覆合加深/开合相关。
在芬兰≥30岁成年人的全国代表性样本中,覆盖过大者的OHRQoL明显低于正常覆盖者。其他错颌特征与OHRQoL无关。然而,所有三种错颌特征均与OHRQoL的身体、心理或社会功能障碍领域相关。