Kutlu Onur C, Chan Jennifer A, Aloia Thomas A, Chun Yun S, Kaseb Ahmed O, Passot Guillaume, Yamashita Suguru, Vauthey Jean-Nicolas, Conrad Claudius
Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(10):1817-1827. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30531. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
Significant controversy exists as to which treatment modality is most effective for small, solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs): radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection (RXN), or transplantation (TXP). Size cutoff values ranging from 20 to 50 mm have been proposed to achieve complete ablation. The current study compares outcomes between RFA, RXN, and TXP as first-line therapy for patients with HCC tumors measuring as large as 50 mm.
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients with HCC tumors measuring up to 50 mm who were treated with RFA, RXN, or TXP between 2004 and 2013. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were examined in patients with tumors measuring ≤20 mm, 21 to 30 mm, or 31 to 50 mm. The impact of an increase in tumor size of only 5 mm beyond 30 mm was evaluated by also examining outcomes in patients with tumors measuring 31 to 35 mm.
Of 1894 cases, patients with HCC tumors measuring ≤20 mm and 21 to 30 mm demonstrated no difference in OS or DSS regardless of whether RFA and RXN was used. RFA was associated with a worse OS and DSS than TXP, whereas there was no difference in OS observed between RXN and TXP. In patients with tumors measuring 31 to 50 mm, OS and DSS were worse with RFA compared with RXN or TXP. Most important, the inferior DSS and OS noted with RFA were observed with only a 5-mm increase in tumors measuring >30 mm.
Although RFA frequently is used as first-line treatment of HCC tumors measuring as large as 50 mm, it is associated with worse results than RXN or TXP for tumors measuring >30 mm. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the results of the current study are the first to demonstrate that although RFA is an appropriate option for patients with HCC tumors measuring ≤30 mm, its use for tumors even slightly larger than 30 mm is associated with inferior outcomes. Cancer 2017;123:1817-1827. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
对于小型孤立性肝细胞癌(HCC)而言,哪种治疗方式最为有效存在重大争议:射频消融(RFA)、手术切除(RXN)还是肝移植(TXP)。已有人提出20至50毫米的大小临界值以实现完全消融。本研究比较了RFA、RXN和TXP作为最大直径达50毫米的HCC肿瘤患者一线治疗方式的疗效。
查询监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库,找出2004年至2013年间接受RFA、RXN或TXP治疗的最大直径达50毫米的HCC肿瘤患者。对肿瘤直径≤20毫米、21至30毫米或31至50毫米的患者进行总生存期(OS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)检查。通过检查肿瘤直径为31至35毫米患者的预后情况,评估肿瘤直径超过30毫米仅增加5毫米的影响。
在1894例病例中,肿瘤直径≤20毫米和21至30毫米的HCC患者,无论采用RFA还是RXN,其OS或DSS均无差异。与TXP相比,RFA与较差的OS和DSS相关,而RXN和TXP之间未观察到OS差异。对于肿瘤直径为31至50毫米的患者,与RXN或TXP相比,RFA的OS和DSS较差。最重要的是,在肿瘤直径>30毫米仅增加5毫米的情况下,就观察到RFA的DSS和OS较差。
尽管RFA经常被用作最大直径达50毫米的HCC肿瘤的一线治疗,但对于直径>30毫米的肿瘤,其疗效比RXN或TXP差。据作者所知,本研究结果首次表明,尽管RFA对于肿瘤直径≤30毫米的HCC患者是一种合适的选择,但其用于甚至略大于30毫米的肿瘤时,疗效较差。《癌症》2017年;123:1817 - 1827。©2017美国癌症协会。