Fokkinga Wietske A, Witter Dick J, Bronkhorst Ewald M, Creugers Nico H
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan/Feb;30(1):33-37. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4977.
The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical fit of metal-frame partial removable dental prostheses (PRDPs) based on custom trays used with alginate or polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Fifth-year students of the Nijmegen Dental School made 25 correct impressions for 23 PRDPs for 21 patients using alginate, and 31 correct impressions for 30 PRDPs for 28 patients using polyvinyl siloxane. Clinical fit of the framework as a whole and of each retainer separately were evaluated by calibrated supervisors during framework try-in before (first evaluation) and after (second evaluation) possible adjustments (score 0 = poor fit, up to score 3 = good fit). Framework fit and fit of the denture base were evaluated at delivery (third evaluation). Finally, postinsertion sessions were evaluated and total number of sessions needed, sore spots, adjustments to the denture base, and reported food-impaction were recorded.
No significant differences in clinical fit (of the framework as a whole, for the retainers, or for the denture base) were found between the groups in the three evaluation sessions. Differences were not found for postinsertion sessions with one exception: in the alginate group, four subjects reported food impaction, versus none in the polyvinyl siloxane group.
Clinical fit of metal-frame PRDPs based on impressions with custom trays combined with alginate or polyvinyl siloxane was similar.
本研究旨在分析基于使用藻酸盐或聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模材料的定制托盘制作的金属框架局部可摘义齿(PRDP)的临床适合性。
奈梅亨牙科学院的五年级学生使用藻酸盐为21名患者的23个PRDP制作了25个正确印模,使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷为28名患者的30个PRDP制作了31个正确印模。在框架试戴期间,由经过校准的监督员在可能的调整之前(第一次评估)和之后(第二次评估)对整个框架以及每个固位体的临床适合性进行评估(评分0 =适合性差,最高评分3 =适合性好)。在交付时评估框架适合性和义齿基托适合性(第三次评估)。最后,对义齿戴入后情况进行评估,并记录所需的总就诊次数、疼痛点、义齿基托调整情况以及报告的食物嵌塞情况。
在三次评估中,两组之间在临床适合性(整个框架、固位体或义齿基托)方面未发现显著差异。在义齿戴入后情况评估中,除了一个例外未发现差异:在藻酸盐组中,有四名受试者报告食物嵌塞,而在聚乙烯基硅氧烷基中无人报告。
基于使用定制托盘结合藻酸盐或聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模制作的金属框架PRDP的临床适合性相似。