Padegimas Eric M, Lawrence Cassandra, Narzikul Alexa C, Zmistowski Benjamin M, Abboud Joseph A, Williams Gerald R, Namdari Surena
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute-Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jun;26(6):975-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.023. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
The clinical implications and treatment of unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) in revision shoulder arthroplasty are not well defined. The purpose of this study was to describe results of patients with and without UPCs after revision shoulder arthroplasty.
A single institutional database was used to retrospectively identify all revision shoulder arthroplasties performed between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013. Patients with preoperative suspicion of infection were excluded. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for future surgery after revision shoulder arthroplasty.
There were 117 revision shoulder arthroplasties without preoperative suspicion of infection. There were 28 of 117 (23.9%) with UPCs, of which 15 (57.1%) were Propionibacterium acnes; 18 of 28 (64.3%) patients received antibiotics for 6 weeks postoperatively without complications compared with 10 of 28 (35.7%) who received a routine 2-week empirical antibiotic regimen; 2 of 28 (7.1%) patients with UPCs required future surgery, and only 1 (3.6%) had a recurrent infection. Comparatively, 18 of 89 (20.2%) patients without UPCs (P = .109) required 25 additional surgeries. Average time to UPC was 4.3 years after index revision. Multivariable regression analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical procedure, and presence of UPCs found no independent predictors of reoperation.
Nearly one-quarter of our institution's revision shoulder arthroplasties had UPCs. The patients without UPCs had a nonsignificantly higher risk of reoperation compared with those with UPCs. We did not identify clinical or demographic variables that independently correlated with reoperation. Further study will be necessary to determine the true clinical benefit of routine culture acquisition in cases with low suspicion for prosthetic joint infection.
翻修肩关节置换术中意外阳性培养结果(UPCs)的临床意义及治疗方法尚不明确。本研究的目的是描述翻修肩关节置换术后有和没有UPCs患者的结果。
使用单一机构数据库回顾性识别2011年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间进行的所有翻修肩关节置换术。排除术前怀疑感染的患者。采用多变量回归分析确定翻修肩关节置换术后再次手术的危险因素。
有117例翻修肩关节置换术术前未怀疑感染。117例中有28例(23.9%)出现UPCs,其中15例(57.1%)为痤疮丙酸杆菌;28例中有18例(64.3%)患者术后接受了6周抗生素治疗且无并发症,相比之下,28例中有10例(35.7%)接受了常规2周经验性抗生素治疗;28例中有2例(7.1%)出现UPCs的患者需要再次手术,只有1例(3.6%)出现复发性感染。相比之下,89例无UPCs的患者中有18例(20.2%)(P = 0.109)需要额外进行25次手术。UPC出现的平均时间为初次翻修术后4.3年。对患者人口统计学、合并症、手术程序和UPCs的存在进行多变量回归分析,未发现再次手术的独立预测因素。
我们机构近四分之一的翻修肩关节置换术出现UPCs。与有UPCs的患者相比,无UPCs的患者再次手术的风险略高,但无统计学意义。我们未发现与再次手术独立相关的临床或人口统计学变量。有必要进一步研究以确定在假体关节感染怀疑度较低的病例中常规培养的真正临床益处。