Suppr超能文献

使用核酸检测对无症状和有症状住院患者进行艰难梭菌检测率的研究

Clostridium difficile rates in asymptomatic and symptomatic hospitalized patients using nucleic acid testing.

作者信息

Truong Cynthia, Schroeder Lee F, Gaur Rajiv, Anikst Victoria Emma, Komo Ikuko, Watters Colleen, McCalley Erin, Kulik Carole, Pickham David, Lee Nancy J, Banaei Niaz

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Department of Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;87(4):365-370. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Clostridium difficile rate in symptomatic patients represents both those with C. difficile infection (CDI) and those with colonization. To predict the extent of CDI overdiagnosis, we compared the asymptomatic colonization rate to the symptomatic positivity rate in hospitalized patients using nucleic acid testing.

METHODS

Between July 2014 and April 2015, formed stool samples were collected from asymptomatic patients after admission to 3 hospital wards at the Stanford Hospital. Stool samples from symptomatic patients with suspected CDI in the same wards were collected for testing per provider order. The GeneXpert C. difficile tcdB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was performed on all stool samples and PCR cycle threshold was used as a measure of genomic equivalents. Chart review was performed to obtain clinical history and medication exposure.

RESULTS

We found an asymptomatic C. difficile carriage rate of 11.8% (43/365) (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5-15.1%) and a positivity rate in symptomatic patients of 15.4% (54/351) (95% CI, 11.6-19.2%; P=0.19). The median PCR cycle thresholds was not significantly different between asymptomatic carriers and symptomatic positives (29.5 versus 27.3; P=0.07). Among asymptomatic patients, 11.6% (5/43) of carriers and 8.4% (27/322; P=0.56) of noncarriers subsequently became symptomatic CDI suspects within the same hospitalization. Single and multivariate analysis did not identify any demographic or clinical factors as being significantly associated with C. difficile carriage.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic C. difficile carriage rate was similar to symptomatic positivity rate. This suggests the majority of PCR-positive results in symptomatic patients are likely due to C. difficile colonization. Disease-specific biomarkers are needed to accurately diagnose patients with C. difficile disease.

摘要

背景

有症状患者中的艰难梭菌检出率既包括艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者,也包括定植患者。为预测CDI过度诊断的程度,我们使用核酸检测比较了住院患者的无症状定植率和有症状阳性率。

方法

在2014年7月至2015年4月期间,从斯坦福医院3个病房入院后的无症状患者中收集成形粪便样本。按照医嘱,收集同一病房疑似CDI的有症状患者的粪便样本进行检测。对所有粪便样本进行GeneXpert艰难梭菌tcdB聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测(美国加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔市的Cepheid公司),并将PCR循环阈值用作基因组当量的衡量指标。进行病历审查以获取临床病史和药物暴露情况。

结果

我们发现无症状艰难梭菌携带率为11.8%(43/365)(95%置信区间[CI],8.5 - 15.1%),有症状患者的阳性率为15.4%(54/351)(95%CI,11.6 - 19.2%;P = 0.19)。无症状携带者和有症状阳性者的PCR循环阈值中位数无显著差异(29.5对27.3;P = 0.07)。在无症状患者中,11.6%(5/43)的携带者和8.4%(27/322;P = 0.56)的非携带者在同一住院期间随后成为有症状的CDI疑似患者。单因素和多因素分析均未发现任何人口统计学或临床因素与艰难梭菌携带显著相关。

结论

无症状艰难梭菌携带率与有症状阳性率相似。这表明有症状患者中大多数PCR阳性结果可能是由于艰难梭菌定植。需要疾病特异性生物标志物来准确诊断艰难梭菌病患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验