Suppr超能文献

提供全方位的避孕选择:对美国家庭计划生育社区输精管切除术培训兴趣的调查。

Offering the full range of contraceptive options: a survey of interest in vasectomy training in the US family planning community.

作者信息

Nguyen Brian T, Jochim Andrea L, Shih Grace H

机构信息

University of Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL; University of Southern California, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA.

University of Washington, Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):500-504. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess current practices regarding female and male sterilization counseling and provision, as well as determine interest in providing vasectomy among family planning specialists.

METHODS

Members of the US-based network of family planning fellowship physicians (current fellows, graduates and faculty) received a Web-based survey from November 2015 through January 2016 regarding current sterilization preferences and practices, as well as interest in obtaining training in vasectomy counseling and procedure.

RESULTS

Nearly 60% (n=178/302) of family planning fellowship providers responded to the survey. While 62% (111/178) of respondents reported counseling their patients about vasectomy at least most of the time and 57% (102/178) recommended vasectomy over female sterilization, few (8/178; 4 trained in family medicine and 4 trained in obstetrics and gynecology) had performed a vasectomy in the last year. Nearly 90% (158/178) of respondents were somewhat or very interested in receiving training on vasectomy counseling; 58% (103/178) desired procedural training. Desire for training was associated with being male and receiving residency training in family medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Few family planning fellowship physicians provide vasectomy, and the majority expressed being at least somewhat interested in receiving further training.

IMPLICATIONS

Vasectomy is more effective, safer and less expensive than female sterilization but is less common than female sterilization. One barrier to vasectomy access is the low number of vasectomy providers. Creating a structured vasectomy training program through the family planning fellowship may help to increase the number of vasectomy providers.

摘要

目的

评估当前关于男性和女性绝育咨询与服务的实践情况,并确定计划生育专家对提供输精管切除术的兴趣。

方法

2015年11月至2016年1月,美国计划生育住院医师网络的成员(现任住院医师、毕业生和教员)接受了一项基于网络的调查,内容涉及当前的绝育偏好和实践情况,以及对获得输精管切除术咨询和手术培训的兴趣。

结果

近60%(n = 178/302)的计划生育住院医师网络提供者回复了调查。虽然62%(111/178)的受访者表示至少大部分时间会向患者咨询输精管切除术,57%(102/178)推荐输精管切除术而非女性绝育术,但去年只有少数人(8/178;4名接受家庭医学培训,4名接受妇产科培训)进行过输精管切除术。近90%(158/178)的受访者对接受输精管切除术咨询培训有些或非常感兴趣;58%(103/178)希望接受手术培训。对培训的渴望与男性身份以及接受家庭医学住院医师培训有关。

结论

很少有计划生育住院医师提供输精管切除术,大多数人表示至少对接受进一步培训有些兴趣。

启示

输精管切除术比女性绝育术更有效、更安全且成本更低,但不如女性绝育术常见。输精管切除术可及性的一个障碍是实施手术的医生数量较少。通过计划生育住院医师培训创建一个结构化的输精管切除术培训项目可能有助于增加实施输精管切除术的医生数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验