Suppr超能文献

青年成人后循环与前循环卒中:青年法布里病患者卒中病因及危险因素的比较研究(sifap1)

Posterior versus Anterior Circulation Stroke in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Stroke Aetiologies and Risk Factors in Stroke among Young Fabry Patients (sifap1).

作者信息

von Sarnowski Bettina, Schminke Ulf, Grittner Ulrike, Tanislav Christian, Böttcher Tobias, Hennerici Michael G, Tatlisumak Turgut, Putaala Jukka, Kaps Manfred, Fazekas Franz, Enzinger Christian, Rolfs Arndt, Kessler Christof

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Medicine, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(3-4):152-160. doi: 10.1159/000454840. Epub 2017 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although 20-30% of all strokes occur in the posterior circulation, few studies have explored the characteristics of patients with strokes in the posterior compared to the anterior circulation so far. Especially data on young patients is missing.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis of data of the prospective multi-centre European sifap1 study that investigated stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients aged 18-55 years, we compared vascular risk factors, stroke aetiology, presence of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and cerebral microbleeds (CMB) between patients with ischaemic posterior circulation stroke (PCS) and those having suffered from anterior circulation stroke (ACS) based on cerebral MRI.

RESULTS

We diagnosed PCS in 612 patients (29.1%, 407 men, 205 women) and ACS in 1,489 patients (70.9%). Their age (median 46 vs. 47 years, p = 0.205) and stroke severity (modified Rankin Scale: both 2, p = 0.375, Barthel Index 90 vs. 85, p = 0.412) were similar. PCS was found to be more frequent among the male gender (66.5 vs. 60.1% with ACS, p = 0.003). Vertebral artery (VA) dissection was more often the cause of PCS (16.8%) than was carotid artery dissection of ACS (7.9%, p < 0.001). Likewise, small vessel disease (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment [TOAST] = 3, PCS: 14.7%, ACS: 11.8%) and stroke of other determined aetiology (TOAST = 4, PCS: 24.5%, ACS: 16.0%) were more frequent in those with PCS. Furthermore, patent foramen ovale (PFO; PCS: 31.1%, ACS: 25.4%, p = 0.029) was more often detected in patients with PCS. In contrast, large-artery atherosclerosis (TOAST = 1, PCS: 15.4%, ACS: 22.2%) and cardio-embolic stroke (TOAST = 2, PCS: 15.6%, ACS: 18.0%) were less frequent in those with PCS (p < 0.001) as were preceding cerebrovascular events (10.1 vs. 14.1%, p = 0.014), TIA (4.8 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.016) and smoking (53.2 vs. 61.0%, p = 0.001). The presence, extent, and location of WMH and CMB did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggested a different pattern of aetiology and risk factors in young patients with PCS compared to those with ACS. These findings especially call for a higher awareness of VA dissection and potentially for more weight of a PFO as a risk factor in young patients with PCS. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00414583.

摘要

背景

尽管所有中风中有20%-30%发生在后循环,但迄今为止,与前循环中风患者相比,很少有研究探讨后循环中风患者的特征。尤其是缺少关于年轻患者的数据。

方法

在这项对前瞻性多中心欧洲sifap1研究数据的二次分析中,该研究调查了18-55岁的中风和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者,我们基于脑部MRI比较了缺血性后循环中风(PCS)患者和前循环中风(ACS)患者之间的血管危险因素、中风病因、白质高信号(WMH)和脑微出血(CMB)的情况。

结果

我们诊断出612例患者为PCS(29.1%,407例男性,205例女性),1489例患者为ACS(70.9%)。他们的年龄(中位数46岁对47岁,p = 0.205)和中风严重程度(改良Rankin量表:均为2分,p = 0.375,Barthel指数90对85,p = 0.412)相似。发现PCS在男性中更常见(66.5%对ACS的60.1%,p = 0.003)。椎动脉(VA)夹层更常是PCS的病因(16.8%),而不是ACS的颈动脉夹层(7.9%,p < 0.001)。同样,小血管疾病(急性中风治疗中Org 10172试验[TOAST]=3,PCS:14.7%,ACS:11.8%)和其他确定病因的中风(TOAST = 4,PCS:24.5%,ACS:16.0%)在PCS患者中更常见。此外,在PCS患者中更常检测到卵圆孔未闭(PFO;PCS:31.1%,ACS:25.4%,p = 0.029)。相比之下,大动脉粥样硬化(TOAST = 1,PCS:15.4%,ACS:22.2%)和心源性栓塞性中风(TOAST = 2,PCS:15.6%,ACS:18.0%)在PCS患者中较少见(p < 0.001),既往脑血管事件(10.1%对14.1%,p = 0.014)、TIA(4.8%对7.7%,p = 0.016)和吸烟(53.2%对61.0%,p = 0.001)也是如此。两组之间WMH和CMB的存在、范围和位置没有差异。

结论

我们的数据表明,与ACS患者相比,年轻PCS患者的病因和危险因素模式不同。这些发现尤其需要提高对VA夹层的认识,并可能需要更重视PFO作为年轻PCS患者的危险因素。临床试验注册-网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov;NCT00414583。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验