Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.10.015. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
The impact of beta-blockers on mortality and hospitalizations was assessed in the largest randomized trial of patients with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): the Atrial Fibrillation-Congestive Heart Failure trial.
Although beta-blockers are the cornerstone of therapy for HFrEF, a recent patient-level meta-analysis cast doubt on their efficacy in patients with coexisting AF.
From a total of 1,376 subjects randomized in the AF-CHF trial, those without beta-blockers at baseline were propensity matched to a maximum of 2 exposed patients. All absolute standardized differences after matching were ≤10%. Primary analyses respected the intention-to-treat principle. In on-treatment sensitivity analyses, beta-blocker status was modeled as a time-dependent covariate.
Baseline characteristics were comparable among the matched cohorts (mean age 70 ± 11 years, 81% male, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 27 ± 6%). During a median follow-up of 37 months, beta-blockers were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.721, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.549 to 0.945; p = 0.0180) but not hospitalizations (HR: 0.886; 95% CI: 0.715 to 1.100; p = 0.2232). Similar results were obtained in sensitivity analyses that modeled beta-blockers as a time-dependent variable (HR: 0.668 for all-cause mortality; 95% CI: 0.511 to 0.874; p = 0.0032; HR: 0.814 for hospitalizations; 95% CI: 0.653 to 1.014; p = 0.0658). There were no significant interactions between beta-blockers and patterns (i.e., persistent vs. paroxysmal) or burden of AF with respect to mortality or hospitalizations.
In propensity-matched analyses, beta-blockers were associated with significantly lower mortality but not hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF and AF, irrespective of the pattern or burden of AF. These results support current evidence-based recommendations for beta-blockers in patients with HFrEF, whether or not they have associated AF.
在最大的伴有射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)的心房颤动(AF)患者随机试验中评估β受体阻滞剂对死亡率和住院率的影响:心房颤动-充血性心力衰竭试验。
尽管β受体阻滞剂是 HFrEF 治疗的基石,但最近的一项患者水平荟萃分析对其在合并 AF 患者中的疗效提出了质疑。
从 AF-CHF 试验中总共随机分配的 1376 名受试者中,无基线时β受体阻滞剂的患者通过倾向匹配最多可匹配 2 名暴露患者。所有匹配后绝对标准化差异均≤10%。主要分析尊重意向治疗原则。在治疗敏感性分析中,将β受体阻滞剂状态建模为时间依赖性协变量。
匹配队列的基线特征相似(平均年龄 70±11 岁,81%为男性,平均左心室射血分数 27±6%)。中位随访 37 个月期间,β受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率显著降低相关(风险比[HR]:0.721,95%置信区间[CI]:0.549 至 0.945;p=0.0180),但与住院率无关(HR:0.886;95%CI:0.715 至 1.100;p=0.2232)。在将β受体阻滞剂建模为时间依赖性变量的敏感性分析中也得到了类似的结果(全因死亡率的 HR:0.668;95%CI:0.511 至 0.874;p=0.0032;住院的 HR:0.814;95%CI:0.653 至 1.014;p=0.0658)。β受体阻滞剂与 AF 的模式(即持续性 vs. 阵发性)或负担与死亡率或住院率之间无显著相互作用。
在倾向匹配分析中,β受体阻滞剂与伴有 HFrEF 和 AF 的患者死亡率显著降低相关,但与住院率无关,无论 AF 的模式或负担如何。这些结果支持当前基于证据的推荐β受体阻滞剂用于 HFrEF 患者,无论他们是否伴有 AF。