Penttilä Patrick, Rautiola Juhana, Poussa Tuija, Peltola Katriina, Bono Petri
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Jun;15(3):384-390.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Research suggests that baseline use of angiotensin system inhibitors (ASIs) improves outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but it remains unknown whether the type of antihypertensive medication used to initiate management at onset of treatment-induced hypertension (HTN) is associated with outcome. We evaluated the association of ASIs and outcome among patients with mRCC treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
We identified 303 consecutive patients with mRCC who were treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in a single university hospital cancer center. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression adjusted for known risk factors.
Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar among patients with baseline HTN (n = 197; 65%) versus patients with no baseline HTN (n = 106; 35%) (PFS; P = .72) (OS; P = .54). There was a significant difference between patients with treatment-induced HTN (n = 110) versus patients with no treatment-induced HTN (n = 193) for PFS (15.6 vs. 6.4 months, respectively; P < .001) and OS (34.9 vs. 13.9 months, respectively; P < .001). Use of ASIs at baseline (n = 126; 41.6%) had no impact on outcome as compared with patients receiving other antihypertensive medication (n = 71; 23.4%) or with patients with no baseline antihypertensive medication (n = 106; 35.0%). Among patients with TKI-induced HTN (n = 110), however, ASI users (n = 91) demonstrated improved OS (37.5 vs. 18.1 months; P = .001) and PFS (17.1 vs. 7.2 months; P = .004) versus ASI nonusers (n = 19), respectively.
Our results demonstrate survival benefit for ASI users among patients with TKI-induced HTN. These results, however, require further validation in a prospective setting.
研究表明,转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者基线使用血管紧张素系统抑制剂(ASI)可改善预后,但治疗诱导的高血压(HTN)发作时用于启动治疗的抗高血压药物类型是否与预后相关仍不清楚。我们评估了一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的mRCC患者中ASI与预后的相关性。
我们在一家大学医院癌症中心确定了303例连续接受舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼治疗的mRCC患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和针对已知风险因素进行调整的Cox回归进行统计分析。
基线高血压患者(n = 197;65%)与无基线高血压患者(n = 106;35%)的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相似(PFS;P = 0.72)(OS;P = 0.54)。治疗诱导的高血压患者(n = 110)与无治疗诱导的高血压患者(n = 193)的PFS(分别为15.6个月和6.4个月;P < 0.001)和OS(分别为34.9个月和13.9个月;P < 0.001)存在显著差异。与接受其他抗高血压药物治疗的患者(n = 71;23.4%)或无基线抗高血压药物治疗的患者(n = 106;35.0%)相比,基线使用ASI(n = 126;41.6%)对预后无影响。然而,在TKI诱导的高血压患者(n = 110)中,使用ASI的患者(n = 91)与未使用ASI的患者(n = 19)相比,OS(分别为37.5个月和18.1个月;P = 0.001)和PFS(分别为17.1个月和7.2个月;P = 0.004)均有所改善。
我们的结果表明,TKI诱导的高血压患者中使用ASI的患者有生存获益。然而,这些结果需要在前瞻性研究中进一步验证。