Suppr超能文献

帕唑帕尼作为舒尼替尼治疗后转移性肾细胞癌患者二线治疗的II期研究:一项中国南方泌尿外科癌症联盟试验

Phase II study of pazopanib as second-line treatment after sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a Southern China Urology Cancer Consortium Trial.

作者信息

Xie Mian, He Chao Sheng, Huang Jin Kun, Lin Qi Zhan

机构信息

Laboratory of translational research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Urology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(5):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

Abstract

This multicentre, single arm, phase II study was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pazopanib as second-line treatment after failure of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and explore biomarkers for pazopanib response. Patients received pazopanib 800mgperday. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Serum proteins (Delta-like ligand (DLL4), Notch1, hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), HIF-2α, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRB)) levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 86 patients with clear cell mRCC were enrolled from December 2009 to March 2012 from three centres in Southern China. Of 85 evaluable patients, the median PFS was 5.6months (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.1-6.7months) by independent review. No complete response (CR) was observed in all patients. 13 (15.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2-23.9%) patients achieved partial responses (PR) (ORR 15.3%). Median OS was 18.1months (95% CI, 13.2-19.8months). The most common adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate and clinically manageable, including hypertension (37.6%), diarrhoea (36.5%), increased AST (51.8%), and anaemia (60%). AEs resulted in dose reduction in 24.7% of patients. Multivariable analysis showed that higher baseline levels of DLL4 and VEGFA and lower baseline level of HIF-2α were associated with shorter PFS; only lower baseline level of HIF-2α was correlated with shorter OS. The lower expression level of DLL4 after pazopanib treatment was associated with higher response rate probability. In conclusion, pazopanib was clinically active and well tolerated as second-line treatment after sunitinib in mRCC patients. Baseline levels of serum DLL4, VEGFA and HIF-2α may have potential utility as biomarkers of clinical efficacy in this setting (chiCTR-TRC-13004016).

摘要

这项多中心、单臂、II期研究旨在评估帕唑帕尼作为转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者舒尼替尼治疗失败后的二线治疗的疗效和安全性,并探索帕唑帕尼反应的生物标志物。患者接受每日800mg帕唑帕尼治疗。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)测量血清蛋白(Delta样配体(DLL4)、Notch1、缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)、HIF-2α、血管内皮生长因子A(VEGFA)和血小板衍生生长因子受体β(PDGFRB))水平。2009年12月至2012年3月,从中国南方三个中心招募了86例透明细胞mRCC患者。在85例可评估患者中,经独立评估,中位PFS为5.6个月(95%置信区间(CI),4.1 - 6.7个月)。所有患者均未观察到完全缓解(CR)。13例(15.3%;95%置信区间[CI],11.2 - 23.9%)患者达到部分缓解(PR)(ORR为15.3%)。中位OS为18.1个月(95% CI,13.2 - 19.8个月)。最常见的不良事件(AE)为轻度至中度且临床可管理,包括高血压(37.6%)、腹泻(36.5%)、AST升高(51.8%)和贫血(60%)。AE导致24.7%的患者剂量减少。多变量分析显示,DLL4和VEGFA的基线水平较高以及HIF-2α的基线水平较低与较短的PFS相关;只有HIF-2α的基线水平较低与较短的OS相关。帕唑帕尼治疗后DLL4的较低表达水平与较高的缓解率可能性相关。总之,在mRCC患者中,帕唑帕尼作为舒尼替尼后的二线治疗具有临床活性且耐受性良好。血清DLL4、VEGFA和HIF-2α的基线水平可能在此情况下作为临床疗效的生物标志物具有潜在用途(中国临床试验注册中心注册号:chiCTR-TRC-13004016)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验