• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

山羊中使用磷酸钙杂交肌腱移植物的解剖双束与单束前交叉韧带重建术后生物力学功能比较

Comparison of postoperative biomechanical function between anatomic double-bundle and single-bundle ACL reconstructions using calcium phosphate-hybridized tendon grafts in goats.

作者信息

Mutsuzaki H, Fujie H, Nakajima H, Fukagawa M, Nomura S, Sakane M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, 4669-2 Ami Ami-Machi, Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki 300-0394, Japan.

Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 6-6 Asahigaoka, Hino, Tokyo 191-0065, Japan.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.013
PMID:28089795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Calcium phosphate (CaP)-hybridized tendon grafts improved biomechanical function compared with untreated grafts after single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical function between anatomic double-bundle (DB) and single-bundle (SB) ACL reconstructions using CaP-hybridized tendon grafts at 6 months postoperatively in goats.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the postoperative biomechanical function in the DB group will be better than that in the SB group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Knee kinematics and in situ forces in the grafts under applied anterior tibial load (ATL) of 50N and internal tibial torque (ITT) of 2.0 Nm at full extension, and 60° and 90° of knee flexion, and the histology of the tendon-bone interface were compared between the DB group (n=6) and SB group (n=6).

RESULTS

The in situ forces under ATL in the DB group at full extension and 90°of knee flexion were greater than those in the SB group. The in situ forces under ITT in the DB group at full extension and 60°of knee flexion were greater than those in the SB group. The in situ forces on the posterolateral bundle of the grafts under ATL and ITT in the DB group at full knee extension were greater than those on the posterior half of the grafts in the SB group. The histology did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CaP-hybridized tendon grafts were used in both groups, the in situ forces under ATL and ITT in the DB group were greater than those in the SB group at 6 months postoperatively. The posterolateral bundle of the grafts in the DB group acted effectively against both ATL and ITT at full extension. The tendon-to-bone healing was similar in both groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study. Level 2.

摘要

背景

在单束(SB)前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后,与未处理的移植物相比,磷酸钙(CaP)杂交肌腱移植物改善了生物力学功能。本研究的目的是比较山羊术后6个月时使用CaP杂交肌腱移植物进行解剖双束(DB)和单束(SB)ACL重建之间的生物力学功能。

假设

我们假设DB组术后生物力学功能将优于SB组。

材料与方法

比较DB组(n = 6)和SB组(n = 6)在50N前向胫骨负荷(ATL)和2.0 Nm胫骨内扭矩(ITT)作用下,膝关节完全伸展、屈曲60°和90°时移植物的膝关节运动学和原位力,以及肌腱-骨界面的组织学情况。

结果

DB组在完全伸展和膝关节屈曲90°时ATL下的原位力大于SB组。DB组在完全伸展和膝关节屈曲60°时ITT下的原位力大于SB组。DB组在膝关节完全伸展时ATL和ITT下移植物后外侧束的原位力大于SB组移植物后半部分的原位力。两组组织学差异不显著。

结论

尽管两组均使用了CaP杂交肌腱移植物,但术后6个月时DB组在ATL和ITT下的原位力大于SB组。DB组移植物的后外侧束在完全伸展时对ATL和ITT均有有效作用。两组肌腱-骨愈合情况相似。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。2级。

相似文献

1
Comparison of postoperative biomechanical function between anatomic double-bundle and single-bundle ACL reconstructions using calcium phosphate-hybridized tendon grafts in goats.山羊中使用磷酸钙杂交肌腱移植物的解剖双束与单束前交叉韧带重建术后生物力学功能比较
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
2
Effect of Calcium Phosphate-Hybridized Tendon Graft in Anatomic Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction in Goats.磷酸钙-肌腱移植物在山羊解剖性单束 ACL 重建中的作用。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Aug 23;4(8):2325967116662653. doi: 10.1177/2325967116662653. eCollection 2016 Aug.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using the quadriceps tendon.使用股四头肌肌腱对解剖单束和双束前交叉韧带重建技术进行生物力学评估。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):687-95. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3462-y. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
4
Comparison of Knee Kinematics After Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via the Medial Portal Technique With a Central Femoral Tunnel and an Eccentric Femoral Tunnel and After Anatomic Double-Bundle Reconstruction: A Human Cadaveric Study.经内侧入路技术分别采用中央股骨隧道和偏心股骨隧道进行单束前交叉韧带重建后与解剖双束重建后的膝关节运动学比较:一项人体尸体研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):126-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546515611646. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
5
A Biomechanical Comparison of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using a Hamstring Tendon Graft.采用腘绳肌腱移植物的单束、双束和三束前交叉韧带重建的生物力学比较。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.124. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
6
Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers.双束前交叉韧带重建技术并未降低翻修风险:来自斯堪的纳维亚登记处的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2503-2512. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5409-3.
7
Biomechanical comparison of graft structures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中移植物结构的生物力学比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Feb;25(2):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4316-6. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a calcium phosphate-hybridized tendon graft: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up.使用磷酸钙杂交肌腱移植物进行解剖单束前交叉韧带重建:一项为期2年随访的随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Dec 29;13(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1045-1.
9
Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical cadaveric study of a rectangular quadriceps and bone--patellar tendon--bone graft configuration versus a round hamstring graft.单束前交叉韧带重建:一种矩形股四头肌和骨-髌腱-骨移植物与圆形腘绳肌移植物的生物力学尸体研究。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1981-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
10
Biomechanical comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: an in vitro study.解剖式单束和双束前交叉韧带重建的生物力学比较:一项体外研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1595-604. doi: 10.1177/0363546513487065. Epub 2013 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Failure rate and patients-reported outcomes at 4-11 years of follow up.双束前交叉韧带重建:4至11年随访的失败率及患者报告的结果
J Orthop. 2019 Feb 28;16(3):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.021. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.
2
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is better than single-bundle reconstruction in terms of objective assessment but not in terms of subjective score.双束前交叉韧带重建在客观评估方面优于单束重建,但在主观评分方面则不然。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2395-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4804-3. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Anteromedial versus transtibial technique in single-bundle autologous hamstring ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.
单束自体腘绳肌前交叉韧带重建术中的前内侧技术与经胫骨技术:前瞻性随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Nov 7;12(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0671-3.