• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑数字减影血管造影术中的辐射剂量分析及剂量降低策略

Analysis of Radiation Doses and Dose Reduction Strategies During Cerebral Digital Subtraction Angiography.

作者信息

Yi Ho Jun, Sung Jae Hoon, Lee Dong Hoon, Kim Sang Wook, Lee Sang Won

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.004
PMID:28089806
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Adverse effects of increased use of cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) include radiation-induced skin reactions and increased risk of malignancy. This study aimed to identify a method for reducing radiation exposure during routine cerebral DSA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 138 consecutive adult patients who underwent DSA with a biplane angiography system (Artis Zee, Siemens, Germany) from September 2015 to February 2016 was performed. In January 2016, the dose parameter was reset by the manufacturer from 2.4 μGy to 1.2 μGy. Predose (group 1) and postdose parameter reduction (group 2) groups were established. Angiograms and procedure examination protocols were reviewed according to patient age, gender, and diagnosis and angiography techniques were reviewed on the basis of the following radiation dose parameters: fluoroscopy time, reference point air kerma (Ka,r; in mGy), and kerma-area product (PKA; in μGym).

RESULTS

The mean Ka,r values in groups 1 and 2 were 1841.5 mGy and 1274.8 mGy, respectively. The mean PKA values in groups 1 and 2 were 23212.5 μGym and 14854.0 μGym, respectively. Ka,r and PKA values were significantly lower in group 2 compared with group 1 (P < 0.001). Among individual factors, young age was a determining factor for reduced fluoroscopy time (P < 0.001), Ka,r (P = 0.047), and PKA (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased awareness of radiation risks, as well as the establishment of strategies to reduce radiation dose, led to lower radiation doses for DSA. The use of appropriate examinations and low-dose parameters in fluoroscopy contributed significantly to the radiation dose reductions.

摘要

目的

增加脑部数字减影血管造影(DSA)的使用所带来的不良反应包括辐射引起的皮肤反应以及患恶性肿瘤风险增加。本研究旨在确定一种在常规脑部DSA期间减少辐射暴露的方法。

方法

对2015年9月至2016年2月期间使用双平面血管造影系统(德国西门子公司的Artis Zee)进行DSA检查的138例连续成年患者进行回顾性研究。2016年1月,制造商将剂量参数从2.4μGy重新设定为1.2μGy。设立了预剂量组(第1组)和剂量参数降低后组(第2组)。根据患者年龄、性别和诊断对血管造影片和操作检查方案进行回顾,并根据以下辐射剂量参数对血管造影技术进行回顾:透视时间、参考点空气比释动能(Ka,r;单位为mGy)和比释动能面积乘积(PKA;单位为μGym)。

结果

第1组和第2组的平均Ka,r值分别为1841.5 mGy和1274.8 mGy。第1组和第2组的平均PKA值分别为23212.5μGym和14854.0μGym。与第1组相比,第2组的Ka,r和PKA值显著更低(P < 0.001)。在个体因素中,年轻是透视时间缩短(P < 0.001)、Ka,r(P = 0.047)和PKA(P = 0.022)的决定因素。

结论

对辐射风险认识的提高以及降低辐射剂量策略的制定,使得DSA的辐射剂量降低。在透视中使用适当的检查和低剂量参数对辐射剂量的降低有显著贡献。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Radiation Doses and Dose Reduction Strategies During Cerebral Digital Subtraction Angiography.脑数字减影血管造影术中的辐射剂量分析及剂量降低策略
World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
2
Analysis of radiation doses incurred during diagnostic cerebral angiography after the implementation of dose reduction strategies.实施降低剂量策略后诊断性脑血管造影的辐射剂量分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Apr;9(4):384-388. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012204. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
Practical techniques for reducing radiation exposure during cerebral angiography procedures.脑血管造影术中减少辐射暴露的实用技术。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Feb;7(2):141-5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010982. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.双能量 CT 血管造影在颅内动脉瘤评估中的应用:图像质量、辐射剂量,以及与三维旋转数字减影血管造影的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):23-30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2290.
5
Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients.神经血管造影中使用图像降噪技术的辐射剂量:一项基于 614 例患者的人群研究。
Neuroradiology. 2013 Nov;55(11):1365-72. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1276-0. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
Diagnostic quality and accuracy of low dose 3D-DSA protocols in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.低剂量3D-DSA方案在颅内动脉瘤评估中的诊断质量和准确性
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 May;7(5):386-90. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011137. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
7
Radiation dose reduction during intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: a retrospective analysis of 96 consecutive pediatric interventions using five distinct protocols.应用五种不同方案对 96 例视网膜母细胞瘤患儿行眼动脉介入化疗时的辐射剂量降低:回顾性分析
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Apr;51(4):649-657. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04892-x. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography.神经血管造影术中儿科患者的体表剂量。
Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Sep;35(9):859-66. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1496-5. Epub 2005 May 26.
9
Combining Coronary with Carotid and Cerebrovascular Angiography Using Prospective ECG Gating and Iterative Reconstruction with 256-slice CT.使用前瞻性心电图门控和256层CT迭代重建技术联合进行冠状动脉、颈动脉和脑血管造影
Echocardiography. 2015 Aug;32(8):1291-8. doi: 10.1111/echo.12830. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
10
Radiation Doses to Staff in a Hybrid Operating Room: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study with Active Electronic Dosimeters.混合手术室中工作人员的辐射剂量:有源电子剂量计人体模型研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;59(4):654-660. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Nanoprobe-Based Near-Infrared II Optical Imaging for Guiding Precision Glioma Therapy.基于纳米探针的近红外二区光学成像用于指导精准胶质瘤治疗
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 Jun 27;20:8433-8449. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S523676. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of wedge filter application in reducing lens radiation dose during diagnostic cerebral angiography: a phantom and prospective study.楔形滤过器在降低诊断性脑血管造影期间晶状体辐射剂量中的有效性:一项模型及前瞻性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11617-x.
3
Radiation Dose during Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Brain-The Influence of Examination Parameters and Patient Factors on the Dose.
脑部数字减影血管造影期间的辐射剂量——检查参数和患者因素对剂量的影响
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):799. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080799.
4
Digital Subtraction Angiography of Cerebral Arteries: Influence of Cranial Dimensions on X-ray Tube Performance.脑动脉数字减影血管造影:颅骨尺寸对X射线管性能的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 May 20;13(10):3002. doi: 10.3390/jcm13103002.
5
Reducing frame rate and pulse rate for routine diagnostic cerebral angiography: ALARA principles in practice.降低常规诊断性脑血管造影的帧率和脉冲率:实践中的防护最优化原则
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;26(1):46-50. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
6
Efficacy and safety of a neurointerventional operation robotic assistance system in cerebral angiography.神经介入手术机器人辅助系统在脑血管造影中的有效性和安全性。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Jun 21;9(3):243-251. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002260.
7
Comparing Radiation Dose of Cerebral Angiography Using Conventional and High kV Techniques: A Retrospective Study on Intracranial Aneurysm Patients and a Phantom Study.比较常规和高千伏技术在脑血管造影中的辐射剂量:颅内动脉瘤患者的回顾性研究和体模研究。
Tomography. 2023 Mar 8;9(2):621-632. doi: 10.3390/tomography9020050.
8
Low-Dose Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography for Evaluating Intracranial Aneurysms: Analysis of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.低剂量三维旋转血管造影评估颅内动脉瘤:图像质量与辐射剂量分析。
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Feb;23(2):256-263. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0162. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Feasibility of low-dose digital subtraction angiography protocols for the endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas.低剂量数字减影血管造影方案在颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘血管内治疗中的可行性。
Neuroradiology. 2021 Feb;63(2):267-273. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02537-2. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
Role of Conventional Dynamic Myelography for Detection of High-Flow Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks : Optimizing the Technique.常规动态脊髓造影在高流量脑脊液漏检测中的作用:优化技术。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Sep;31(3):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00943-w. Epub 2020 Aug 26.