Moghadam-Kia Siamak, Oddis Chester V, Sato Shinji, Kuwana Masataka, Aggarwal Rohit
From the Myositis Center and Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University, School of Medicine, Isehara; Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
S. Moghadam-Kia, MPH, MSc, Myositis Center and Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; C.V. Oddis, MD, Myositis Center and Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; S. Sato, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University, School of Medicine; M. Kuwana, MD, Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine; R. Aggarwal, MD, MS, Myositis Center and Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
J Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;44(3):319-325. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160682. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
To determine the clinical features associated with the antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody (anti-MDA5) in US patients with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) and classic DM.
Patients with CADM were consecutively selected from the University of Pittsburgh Myositis Database from 1985 to 2013. CADM was defined by a typical DM rash without objective muscle weakness and no or minimal abnormalities of muscle enzymes, electromyography, or muscle biopsy. DM was defined by Bohan and Peter criteria and was 1:1 matched (sex and age ± 5 yrs) to patients with CADM. Anti-MDA5 autoAb levels were determined using ELISA. Clinical features were compared between CADM and DM and between MDA5-positive and MDA5-negative subjects, using chi-squared and/or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate.
We identified 61 patients with CADM who were matched to 61 DM controls (female 62% vs 64%; mean age 44.8 yrs vs 48.2, p < 0.5). Anti-MDA5 frequency was the same in both cohorts (13.1%), and anti-MDA5 was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of cutaneous ulcers, digital tip ulcerations, and puffy fingers as well as interstitial lung disease (ILD). Most patients with ILD had rapidly progressive ILD (RPILD) leading to early death. Patients with CADM were more likely to have dysphagia, but there were no other clinical differences seen associated with CADM as compared to classic DM.
Anti-MDA5 positivity had a similar frequency in US patients with CADM and DM and is associated with ILD, RPILD, cutaneous ulcers, digital tip ulceration, and poor survival.
确定美国临床无肌病性皮肌炎(CADM)和经典皮肌炎(DM)患者中与抗黑色素瘤分化相关基因5抗体(抗MDA5)相关的临床特征。
从匹兹堡大学肌炎数据库中连续选取1985年至2013年的CADM患者。CADM定义为有典型的DM皮疹但无客观肌肉无力,且肌肉酶、肌电图或肌肉活检无异常或仅有轻微异常。DM根据博汉和彼得标准定义,并与CADM患者按1:1匹配(性别和年龄±5岁)。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)测定抗MDA5自身抗体水平。采用卡方检验和/或曼-惠特尼U检验,适当比较CADM和DM之间以及MDA5阳性和MDA5阴性受试者之间的临床特征。
我们确定了61例CADM患者,并与61例DM对照匹配(女性分别为62%和64%;平均年龄分别为44.8岁和48.2岁,p<0.5)。两个队列中抗MDA5的频率相同(13.1%),抗MDA5与皮肤溃疡、指尖溃疡、手指肿胀以及间质性肺病(ILD)的可能性显著相关。大多数ILD患者有快速进展性ILD(RPILD),导致早期死亡。CADM患者更易出现吞咽困难,但与经典DM相比,未发现与CADM相关的其他临床差异。
在美国CADM和DM患者中,抗MDA5阳性的频率相似,且与ILD、RPILD、皮肤溃疡、指尖溃疡及生存率低相关。