Suppr超能文献

重新审视用于评估东亚人群右心房压力的下腔静脉参数——超声-导管同步对比研究

Reconsideration of Inferior Vena Cava Parameters for Estimating Right Atrial Pressure in an East Asian Population - Comparative Simultaneous Ultrasound-Catheterization Study.

作者信息

Kawata Takayuki, Daimon Masao, Lee Seitetsu L, Kimura Koichi, Sawada Naoko, Chiang Shuo-Ju, Mahara Keitaro, Okubo Takeshi, Nakao Tomoko, Hirokawa Megumi, Xu Boqing, Kato Tomoko S, Watanabe Masafumi, Yatomi Yutaka, Komuro Issei

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the University of Tokyo.

出版信息

Circ J. 2017 Feb 24;81(3):346-352. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0916. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound measurements of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter (IVCD), together with its respiratory variation, provide a noninvasive estimate of right atrial pressure (RAP). However, there is a paucity of studies that have compared this technique with simultaneous catheterization. We explored the best cut-off values of IVC parameters for elevated RAP in comparison with RAP measured by catheterization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 120 East Asian patients who were scheduled for catheterization. The IVCD and IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) were measured according to the current guidelines. The optimal maximum IVCD (IVCDmax) and IVCCI cut-offs for detecting elevated RAP (RAP ≥10 mmHg) were 17 mm and 40%, respectively. When we combined both in proportion to the guidelines, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting elevated RAP were 75% and 94%, respectively. When the cut-off values from the current guidelines (>21 mm and <50%) were applied, the respective sensitivity and specificity were 42% and 99%. Interestingly, the cut-off value of the optimal IVCDmax indexed by body surface area (11 mm/m) was similar to previous Western population data. When we combined both cut-off values (11 mm/mand 40%), the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal absolute IVCDmax and IVCCI cut-offs to detect elevated RAP were smaller than those in the current guidelines. Indexed IVCDmax may be an IVC parameter that can be used internationally.

摘要

背景

超声测量下腔静脉(IVC)直径(IVCD)及其呼吸变化,可对右心房压力(RAP)进行无创评估。然而,将该技术与同步导管插入术进行比较的研究较少。我们探讨了与导管插入术测量的RAP相比,IVC参数用于评估升高的RAP的最佳临界值。

方法与结果

我们前瞻性纳入了120例计划进行导管插入术的东亚患者。根据现行指南测量IVCD和IVC可塌陷指数(IVCCI)。检测升高的RAP(RAP≥10 mmHg)的最佳最大IVCD(IVCDmax)和IVCCI临界值分别为17 mm和40%。按照指南将两者结合时,检测升高的RAP的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和94%。应用现行指南的临界值(>21 mm和<50%)时,敏感性和特异性分别为42%和99%。有趣的是,按体表面积计算的最佳IVCDmax临界值(11 mm/m²)与先前西方人群的数据相似。当我们将两个临界值(11 mm/m²和40%)结合时,敏感性和特异性分别为75%和95%。

结论

检测升高的RAP的最佳绝对IVCDmax和IVCCI临界值小于现行指南中的值。按体表面积计算的IVCDmax可能是一个可在国际上使用的IVC参数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验