Erber J T
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami.
J Gerontol. 1989 Nov;44(6):P170-5. doi: 10.1093/geronj/44.6.p170.
A person-perception approach was employed to investigate people's appraisal of young or older target persons' everyday memory failures as described in 28 vignettes of more serious and less serious types of memory failure. In Experiment 1 of the study, 115 young adults rated each of 28 memory failure vignettes on a 7-point seriousness scale. Mrs. X, the target person in the vignettes, was described either as age 30 or 70. Vignettes in the more serious category were rated, as expected, more stringently than vignettes in the less serious category. Also, the young subjects rated Mrs. X age 70 more stringently than Mrs. X age 30, regardless of the seriousness level of the vignettes. In Experiment 2, 79 older adults evaluated the same vignettes, again with Mrs. X either age 30 or 70. Again, vignettes in the more serious category were rated more stringently than vignettes in the less serious category. However, older adults rated Mrs. X age 30 and Mrs. X age 70 equivalently. In a final overall analysis, older adults were more lenient than the young in memory failure judgments, and their differential leniency was most apparent in judgments of the serious vignettes.
采用人物认知方法,以28个描述了或轻或重的记忆失误类型的短文为依据,来调查人们对年轻或年长目标人物日常记忆失误的评价。在该研究的实验1中,115名年轻人对28个记忆失误短文,按照7分量表的严重程度进行评分。短文中的目标人物X夫人,被描述为30岁或70岁。正如预期的那样,更严重类别的短文评分比不太严重类别的短文更为严格。此外,年轻受试者对70岁的X夫人的评分比30岁的X夫人更为严格,无论短文的严重程度如何。在实验2中,79名老年人对相同的短文进行评估,同样将X夫人设定为30岁或70岁。同样,更严重类别的短文评分比不太严重类别的短文更为严格。然而,老年人对30岁的X夫人和70岁的X夫人的评分相同。在最终的总体分析中,老年人在记忆失误判断上比年轻人更为宽容,并且他们的差异宽容度在对严重短文的判断中最为明显。