Suppr超能文献

非心脏手术患者围手术期β受体阻滞剂——科学不端行为与临床指南

Perioperative β-Blockers in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery-Scientific Misconduct and Clinical Guidelines.

作者信息

Karam Dhauna, Arora Rohit

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2017 Jul/Aug;24(4):e435-e441. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000548.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

β-blocker use in perioperative period of noncardiac surgeries has been a topic of debate since many years. Earlier studies conducted in the 90s showed decreased cardiac adverse events and improved postoperative outcomes with β-blocker use. Based on this, the ACCF and ESC published guidelines strongly supporting β-blocker use. But contemporaneous studies conducted revealed conflicting evidence and have also proven some of the earlier studies to be fraudulent. Although ACCF guidelines have been updated to partially reflect the changes, ESC guidelines continue to support β-blocker use.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

In light of the ACCF and ESC guidelines supporting β-blocker use in perioperative period of noncardiac surgeries, our aim was to review the available literature and consolidate evidence in this regard.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed search was conducted to include relevant studies between 1950 and 2015.

RESULTS

We reviewed 24 eligible studies and few debates conducted in this regard. Based on our review, our findings were as follows: β-blockers should be continued throughout perioperative period in patients who were on β-blockers before surgery for other indications such as angina, hypertension, and symptomatic arrhythmias. Preoperative β-blockers are indicated in patients undergoing high risk vascular surgery or those having high preoperative Cardiac Risk Index Score. In patients with intermediate-to-low cardiac risk, the proven benefit is not sufficient enough to suggest universal use.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our review, we conclude that the use of β-blockers in perioperative period of noncardiac surgeries should be determined on an individual basis based on risk-benefit analysis. Guideline organizations should update their recommendations based on new evidence.

摘要

背景

多年来,β受体阻滞剂在非心脏手术围手术期的应用一直是一个有争议的话题。20世纪90年代进行的早期研究表明,使用β受体阻滞剂可减少心脏不良事件并改善术后结局。基于此,美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)发布了强烈支持使用β受体阻滞剂的指南。但同期进行的研究显示出相互矛盾的证据,并且还证明一些早期研究存在欺诈行为。尽管ACCF指南已更新以部分反映这些变化,但ESC指南仍支持使用β受体阻滞剂。

不确定领域

鉴于ACCF和ESC指南支持在非心脏手术围手术期使用β受体阻滞剂,我们的目的是回顾现有文献并整合这方面的证据。

数据来源

进行了PubMed搜索,以纳入1950年至2015年期间的相关研究。

结果

我们回顾了24项符合条件的研究以及在这方面进行的一些辩论。基于我们的回顾,我们的发现如下:对于因心绞痛、高血压和症状性心律失常等其他适应症而在术前使用β受体阻滞剂的患者,应在整个围手术期继续使用。术前β受体阻滞剂适用于接受高风险血管手术的患者或术前心脏风险指数评分高的患者。对于心脏风险为中低的患者,已证实的益处不足以建议普遍使用。

结论

基于我们的回顾,我们得出结论,非心脏手术围手术期β受体阻滞剂的使用应基于风险效益分析进行个体化确定。指南制定组织应根据新证据更新其建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验