Bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis with additional pulmonary blood flow: good or bad pre-Fontan strategy.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of preserved additional pulmonary blood flow (APBF) on survival after bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BCPS) and completion of Fontan circulation.

METHODS

From March 2003 and April 2015, 156 patients with a single ventricle underwent BCPS. After performing propensity score analysis (1:1) for the entire sample, 50 patients with APBF (APBF group) were matched with 50 patients without APBF (no-APBF group).

RESULTS

Age ( P  = 0.90), sex ( P  = 0.57), weight ( P  = 0.75), single ventricle morphology ( P =  0.87), type of neonatal palliative procedure ( P =  0.52), saturation ( P =  0.35), ejection fraction ( P =  0.90), Nakata index ( P  = 0.70) and mean pulmonary artery pressure ( P  = 0.72) were not significantly different between the groups. No significant survival difference was demonstrated ( P  = 0.54). One and 4-year survival rates were both 89.1% ± 4.6% in the APBF group and 87.2% ± 4.9% and 83.4% ± 5.9%, respectively, in the no-APBF group. There was no significant difference in rates of Fontan completion ( P  = 0.24), which was achieved in 22 patients from the APBF group (55.0%) and 26 patients from the no-APBF group (65.0%). However, Fontan completion occurred significantly earlier in the no-APBF group ( P  < 0.01). In this group, Fontan procedure was performed before 36 months of inter-stage period in 45.9% ± 8.5% of cases (95% CI 31.0-63.7%) compared to only 13.3 ± 5.6% (95% CI 5.8-29.1%) in the APBF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that APBF does not affect survival after BCPS or Fontan completion rate. APBF allows postponing the Fontan procedure without a negative effect on clinical status.