Di Giambenedetto Simona, Fabbiani Massimiliano, Quiros Roldan Eugenia, Latini Alessandra, D'Ettorre Gabriella, Antinori Andrea, Castagna Antonella, Orofino Giancarlo, Francisci Daniela, Chinello Pierangelo, Madeddu Giordano, Grima Pierfrancesco, Rusconi Stefano, Di Pietro Massimo, Mondi Annalisa, Ciccarelli Nicoletta, Borghetti Alberto, Focà Emanuele, Colafigli Manuela, De Luca Andrea, Cauda Roberto
Institute of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
University Division of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Apr 1;72(4):1163-1171. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw557.
Combination ART (cART)-related toxicities and costs have prompted the need for treatment simplification. The ATLAS-M trial explored 48 week non-inferior efficacy of simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine versus maintaining three-drug atazanavir/ritonavir-based cART in virologically suppressed patients.
We performed an open-label, multicentre, randomized, non-inferiority study, enrolling HIV-infected adults on atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs, with stable HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL and CD4 + >200 cells/mm 3 . Main exclusion criteria were hepatitis B virus coinfection, past virological failure on or resistance to study drugs, recent AIDS and pregnancy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either switch to 300 mg of atazanavir/100 mg of ritonavir once daily and 300 mg of lamivudine once daily (atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm) or to continue the previous regimen (atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm). The primary study outcome was the maintenance of HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 of the ITT-exposed (ITT-e) analysis with switch = failure. The non-inferiority margin was 12%. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01599364.
Between July 2011 and June 2014, 266 patients were randomized (133 to each arm). After 48 weeks, the primary study outcome was met by 119 of 133 patients (89.5%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm and 106 of 133 patients (79.7%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm [difference atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine versus atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm: +9.8% (95% CI + 1.2 to + 18.4)], demonstrating non-inferiority and superior efficacy of the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm. Virological failure occurred in two (1.5%) patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm and six (4.5%) patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm, without resistance selection. A similar proportion of adverse events occurred in both arms.
Treatment simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine showed non-inferior efficacy (superiority on post-hoc analysis) and a comparable safety profile over continuing atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs in virologically suppressed patients.
抗逆转录病毒联合疗法(cART)相关的毒性和成本促使人们需要简化治疗方案。ATLAS-M试验探讨了在病毒学抑制的患者中,简化为阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 拉米夫定治疗48周的疗效是否不劣于维持基于阿扎那韦/利托那韦的三联cART方案。
我们进行了一项开放标签、多中心、随机、非劣效性研究,纳入接受阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂治疗的HIV感染成人,其HIV-RNA稳定低于50拷贝/mL且CD4+>200细胞/mm³。主要排除标准为合并乙型肝炎病毒感染、既往对研究药物出现病毒学失败或耐药、近期患艾滋病及妊娠。患者按1:1随机分配,要么改为每日一次服用300mg阿扎那韦/100mg利托那韦和每日一次服用300mg拉米夫定(阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 拉米夫定组),要么继续之前的治疗方案(阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂组)。主要研究结局是在意向性分析(ITT-e)的第48周时维持HIV-RNA低于50拷贝/mL,转换视为失败情况。非劣效性界值为12%。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01599364。
2011年7月至2014年6月期间,266例患者被随机分组(每组133例)。48周后,阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 拉米夫定组133例患者中有119例(89.5%)达到主要研究结局,阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂组133例患者中有106例(79.7%)达到主要研究结局[阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 拉米夫定组与阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂组的差异:+9.8%(95%CI +1.2至+18.4)],表明阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 拉米夫定组具有非劣效性且疗效更优。阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 拉米夫定组有2例(1.5%)患者出现病毒学失败,阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂组有6例(4.5%)患者出现病毒学失败,未出现耐药选择情况。两组不良事件发生率相似。
在病毒学抑制的患者中,简化为阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 拉米夫定治疗显示出非劣效性疗效(事后分析显示更优),且安全性与继续使用阿扎那韦/利托那韦 + 两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂相当。