Suppr超能文献

根据极早产儿1法国规格外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的导管尖端位置,其留置时间及非选择性拔除的风险

Dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters according to catheter tip position in very preterm infants.

作者信息

Erhard Daniela M, Nguyen Sarah, Guy Katelyn J, Casalaz Dan M, König Kai

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Mercy Hospital for Women, 163 Studley Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3084, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;176(3):407-411. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2854-7. Epub 2017 Jan 16.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We investigated dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 975 single-lumen 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters (1FR-PICC) according to tip position in a cohort of very preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27 (2) weeks and a mean (SD) birth weight of 988 (294) g over an eight-year period. Infants with a 1FR-PICC inserted for continuous infusion of intravenous fluids within the first 30 days of life were eligible. Dwell times of PICC with elective versus non-elective removal, risk of non-elective removal of PICC according to tip position, and differences between upper versus lower limb catheter insertion were analysed. 33.8% PICC were removed non-electively. Median (IQR) dwell time was 193 (142-287) versus 154 (102-260) h for elective versus non-elective removal (p < 0.001). Non-elective removal was more common for lower limb insertion sites: 41 versus 31% (p = 0.002). PICC were significantly more likely to be removed non-electively when located in the axillary (odds ratio (OR) 2.08), cephalic (OR 8.93), external iliac (OR 4.99), and femoral (OR 10.31) vein.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, dwell times of 1FR-PICC lines removed non-electively were similar to 1.9- or 2.0FR-PICC. PICC tips positioned in the axillary, cephalic, external iliac, and femoral veins had a higher risk of non-elective removal. What is Known: •Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are widely used in neonatal intensive care. •Previous studies focused on 2-French PICC and newborns of all gestational ages. What is New: •Dwell times of 1-French PICC removed non-electively were similar to 2-French PICC. •1-French PICC tips positioned more peripherally had a higher risk of non-elective removal.

摘要

未标注

我们在一个平均(标准差)胎龄为27(2)周、平均(标准差)出生体重为988(294)克的极早产儿队列中,根据尖端位置对975根单腔1法国规格的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(1FR - PICC)的留置时间和非选择性拔除风险进行了为期八年的研究。在出生后30天内插入1FR - PICC用于持续静脉输液的婴儿符合条件。分析了选择性拔除与非选择性拔除的PICC的留置时间、根据尖端位置的PICC非选择性拔除风险以及上肢与下肢导管插入之间的差异。33.8%的PICC被非选择性拔除。选择性拔除与非选择性拔除的中位(四分位间距)留置时间分别为193(142 - 287)小时和154(102 - 260)小时(p < 0.001)。下肢插入部位的非选择性拔除更为常见:41%对31%(p = 0.002)。当PICC位于腋静脉(优势比(OR)2.08)、头静脉(OR 8.93)、髂外静脉(OR 4.99)和股静脉(OR 10.31)时,非选择性拔除的可能性显著更高。

结论

在这个队列中,非选择性拔除的1FR - PICC导管的留置时间与1.9或2.0FR - PICC相似。位于腋静脉、头静脉、髂外静脉和股静脉的PICC尖端非选择性拔除的风险更高。已知信息:•外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)在新生儿重症监护中广泛使用。•先前的研究集中在2法国规格的PICC和所有孕周的新生儿。新发现:•非选择性拔除的1法国规格PICC的留置时间与2法国规格PICC相似。•位置更外周的1法国规格PICC尖端非选择性拔除的风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验