Department of Cardiac Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; King Salman Heart Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.056. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
Ex vivo measurement of ascending aortic biomechanical properties may help understand the risk for rupture or dissection of dilated ascending aortas. A validated in vivo method that can predict aortic biomechanics does not exist. Speckle tracking transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been used to measure ventricular stiffness; we sought to determine whether speckle TEE could be adapted to estimate aortic stiffness in vivo and compare these findings with those obtained by ex vivo tissue measurements.
A total of 17 patients undergoing ascending aortic resection were recruited to with a mean aortic diameter was 56.16 ± 15 mm. Intraoperative speckle TEE tracking analysis was used to calculate aortic stiffness index using the following equation: β2=ln(SBP/DBP)/AoS, where β2 is the stiffness index; SBP is systolic blood pressure; DBP is diastolic blood pressure; and AoS is the circumferential strain. Ex vivo stiffness was obtained by mechanical tissue testing according to previously described methods. The aortic ring at the pulmonary trunk was divided into 4 equal quadrants.
The in vivo stiffness index for the inner curvature, anterior wall, outer curvature, and posterior wall were 0.0544 ± 0.0490, 0.0295 ± 0.0199, 0.0411 ± 0.0328, and 0.0502 ± 0.0320, respectively. The mean ex vivo 25% apparent stiffness for inner curvature, anterior wall, outer curvature, and posterior wall were 0.0616 ± 0.0758 MPa, 0.0352 ± 0.00992 MPa, 0.0405 ± 0.0199 MPa, and 0.0327 ± 0.0106 MPa, respectively. The patient-matched ex vivo 25% apparent stiffness and in vivo stiffness index were not significantly different (P = .8617, 2-way analysis of variance with repeated measures).
The use of speckle TEE appears to be a promising technique to estimate ex vivo mechanical properties of the ascending aortic tissue.
体外测量升主动脉生物力学特性有助于了解扩张升主动脉破裂或夹层的风险。目前尚不存在一种经过验证的、可预测主动脉生物力学的体内方法。斑点追踪经食管超声心动图(TEE)已被用于测量心室僵硬度;我们试图确定斑点 TEE 是否可以适应于体内估计主动脉僵硬度,并将这些发现与体外组织测量结果进行比较。
共纳入 17 例行升主动脉切除术的患者,平均主动脉直径为 56.16±15mm。术中采用斑点 TEE 跟踪分析,通过以下公式计算主动脉僵硬度指数:β2=ln(SBP/DBP)/AoS,其中β2 为僵硬度指数;SBP 为收缩压;DBP 为舒张压;AoS 为周向应变。根据先前描述的方法,通过机械组织测试获得体外僵硬度。在肺动脉干处将主动脉环分为 4 个相等的象限。
内弯曲、前壁、外弯曲和后壁的体内僵硬度指数分别为 0.0544±0.0490、0.0295±0.0199、0.0411±0.0328 和 0.0502±0.0320。内弯曲、前壁、外弯曲和后壁的平均体外 25%可见僵硬度分别为 0.0616±0.0758 MPa、0.0352±0.00992 MPa、0.0405±0.0199 MPa 和 0.0327±0.0106 MPa。患者匹配的体外 25%可见僵硬度和体内僵硬度指数无显著差异(P=0.8617,2 因素重复测量方差分析)。
斑点 TEE 的使用似乎是一种很有前途的技术,可以估计升主动脉组织的体外力学特性。