• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在干燥条件下以及存在唾液污染的情况下,对使用两种不同粘结剂粘结的金属托槽的剪切粘结强度进行比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination.

作者信息

Khanehmasjedi Mashallah, Naseri Mohammad Ali, Khanehmasjedi Samaneh, Basir Leila

机构信息

Department of orthodontics, Dental School, Ahwaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

School of Dentistry, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Borujerd, Iran.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Feb;80(2):103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.10.003. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcma.2016.10.003
PMID:28094232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with Single Bond and Assure bonding agents under dry and saliva-contamination conditions.

METHODS

Sixty sound premolar teeth were selected, and stainless-steel brackets were bonded on enamel surfaces with Single Bond and Assure bonding agents under dry condition or with saliva contamination. Shear bond strength values of brackets were measured in a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index scores were determined after debonding of the brackets under a stereomicroscope. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze bond strength. Two-by-two comparisons were made with post hoc Tukey tests (p<0.001). Frequencies of adhesive remnant index scores were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Bond strength values of brackets to tooth structure were 9.29±8.56 MPa and 21.25±8.93 MPa with the use of Assure resin bonding agent under saliva-contamination and dry conditions, respectively. These values were 10.13±6.69 MPa and 14.09±6.6 MPa, respectively, under the same conditions with the use of Single Bond adhesive. Contamination with saliva resulted in a significant decrease in the bond strength of brackets to tooth structure with the application of Assure adhesive resin (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the adhesive remnant index scores between the study groups.

CONCLUSION

Application of Single Bond and Assure bonding agents resulted in adequate bond strength of brackets to tooth structures. Contamination with saliva significantly decreased the bond strength of Assure bonding agent compared with dry conditions.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了在干燥和唾液污染条件下,使用单键粘结剂和确信粘结剂粘结金属托槽的剪切粘结强度。

方法

选择60颗完好的前磨牙,在干燥条件下或有唾液污染的情况下,用单键粘结剂和确信粘结剂将不锈钢托槽粘结在牙釉质表面。在万能试验机上测量托槽的剪切粘结强度值。在立体显微镜下托槽脱粘后确定粘结剂残留指数评分。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析粘结强度。采用事后Tukey检验进行两两比较(p<0.001)。通过Kruskal-Wallis检验分析粘结剂残留指数评分的频率。

结果

在唾液污染和干燥条件下,使用确信树脂粘结剂时,托槽与牙齿结构的粘结强度值分别为9.29±8.56MPa和21.25±8.93MPa。在相同条件下使用单键粘结剂时,这些值分别为10.13±6.69MPa和14.09±6.6MPa。唾液污染导致使用确信粘结树脂时托槽与牙齿结构的粘结强度显著降低(p<0.001)。研究组之间的粘结剂残留指数评分没有显著差异。

结论

使用单键粘结剂和确信粘结剂可使托槽与牙齿结构具有足够的粘结强度。与干燥条件相比,唾液污染显著降低了确信粘结剂的粘结强度。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination.在干燥条件下以及存在唾液污染的情况下,对使用两种不同粘结剂粘结的金属托槽的剪切粘结强度进行比较评估。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Feb;80(2):103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.10.003. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
2
Effect of water and saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of a new light-cured cyanoacrylate adhesive.水和唾液污染对新型光固化氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂剪切粘结强度的影响。
Prog Orthod. 2007;8(1):100-11.
3
Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.三种粘结剂的粘结强度比较:复合树脂、混合型玻璃离子水门汀和玻璃填充型玻璃离子水门汀。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan;119(1):36-42. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.110519.
4
Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.唾液和水污染对光固化玻璃离子水门汀釉质剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Apr;113(4):402-7.
5
Shear bond strength of metallic brackets: influence of saliva contamination.金属托槽的剪切粘结强度:唾液污染的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 May-Jun;17(3):190-4. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000300011.
6
Effect of an antioxidizing agent on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to bleached human enamel.抗氧化剂对粘结于漂白人牙釉质上的托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Feb;129(2):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.043.
7
Influence of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching adhesive systems.唾液污染对自酸蚀粘接系统粘接正畸托槽的剪切粘接强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.035.
8
Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength with a hydrophilic composite resin.唾液污染对与亲水性复合树脂粘结强度的影响。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Jan-Feb;18(1):63-8. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000100015.
9
[Comparison on shear bond strength of Edgewise brackets bonding with three orthodontic adhesives against salivary contamination].
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2003 Dec;12(6):453-5.
10
Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets bonded with a protective liquid polish and a light-cured adhesive.血液和唾液污染对使用保护性液体抛光剂和光固化粘合剂粘结的托槽粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.049.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces utilizing different adhesive systems: An study.使用不同粘结系统将金属托槽粘结到陶瓷表面的剪切粘结强度比较:一项研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Nov 2;12:73. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_12_23. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of Hemostatic Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Eyelets Bonded with Conventional and Self-etch Adhesives.止血剂对用传统型和自酸蚀型粘合剂粘结的正畸带环剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Jun;23(1 Suppl):222-229. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.89677.1439.
3
Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with a Self-Adhering Composite in Dry and Saliva-Contaminated Conditions.
在干燥和唾液污染条件下,用自粘结复合材料粘结的正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度。
Front Dent. 2022 Jan 25;19:5. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i5.8548. eCollection 2022.
4
Orthodontic Bonding: Review of the Literature.正畸粘结:文献综述
Int J Dent. 2020 Jul 14;2020:8874909. doi: 10.1155/2020/8874909. eCollection 2020.