Burrowes Patricia A, De la Riva Ignacio
1 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931, USA.
2 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, C/ José Gutiérrez Abascal, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
J Wildl Dis. 2017 Apr;53(2):349-355. doi: 10.7589/2016-04-074. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
The occurrence of the pathogenic chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) in the feet of live waterfowl has been documented, but the potential role of birds as dispersers has not been studied. We report the presence of Bd in the feet of preserved aquatic birds in the Bolivian high Andes during the time of drastic amphibian declines in the country. We sampled 48 aquatic birds from the Bolivian Andes that were preserved in museum collections. Birds were sampled for the presence of Bd DNA by swabbing, taking small pieces of tissue from toe webbing, or both. We detected Bd by DNA using quantitative PCR in 42% of the birds sampled via toe tissue pieces. This method was significantly better than swabbing at detecting Bd from bird feet. We confirmed Bd presence by sequencing Bd -positive samples and found 91-98% homology with Bd sequences from GenBank. Our study confirms that aquatic birds can carry Bd and thus may serve as potential vectors of this pathogen across large distances and complex landscapes. In addition, we recommend using DNA from preserved birds as a novel source of data to test hypotheses on the spread of chytridiomycosis in amphibians.
致病性壶菌蛙壶菌(Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis,简称Bd)在活禽足部出现的情况已有记录,但鸟类作为传播者的潜在作用尚未得到研究。我们报告了在玻利维亚安第斯山脉高地两栖动物数量急剧下降期间,保存在博物馆中的水鸟足部存在Bd的情况。我们从保存在博物馆藏品中的48只玻利维亚安第斯山脉水鸟身上取样。通过擦拭、从趾蹼取小块组织或两者兼用的方式对鸟类进行取样,以检测是否存在Bd DNA。我们通过定量PCR在42%通过趾部组织块取样的鸟类中检测到了Bd DNA。这种方法在检测鸟类足部的Bd方面明显优于擦拭取样法。我们通过对Bd阳性样本进行测序确认了Bd的存在,并发现与GenBank中的Bd序列有91%-98%的同源性。我们的研究证实水鸟可以携带Bd,因此可能成为这种病原体在远距离和复杂地貌中的潜在传播媒介。此外,我们建议将保存在博物馆中的鸟类DNA作为一种新的数据来源,用于检验关于两栖动物壶菌病传播的假说。