Suppr超能文献

三种牙科黏固水门汀的实验室与临床评估

A laboratory and clinical evaluation of three dental luting cements.

作者信息

Knibbs P J, Walls A W

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 1989 Sep;16(5):467-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01367.x.

Abstract

The loss of material from specimens of three luting cements was measured after continuous erosion cycling in the laboratory. The glass ionomer luting cement showed significantly less material loss than the zinc polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate luting cements. Two hundred and fifty restorations cemented with one of the three materials were studied clinically for marginal integrity and retention over 3.5 years. The data were tested using survival analysis. Zinc phosphate cement gave the best clinical performance. Possible explanations for the poor correlation between the findings in the laboratory and clinical study are discussed.

摘要

在实验室中对三种粘结水门汀的标本进行连续侵蚀循环后,测量了材料损失。玻璃离子粘结水门汀的材料损失明显少于聚羧酸锌和磷酸锌粘结水门汀。临床上对用这三种材料之一粘结的250颗修复体进行了3.5年的边缘完整性和固位情况研究。使用生存分析对数据进行了测试。磷酸锌水门汀的临床性能最佳。讨论了实验室研究结果与临床研究结果之间相关性较差的可能原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验