Knibbs P J, Walls A W
Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
J Oral Rehabil. 1989 Sep;16(5):467-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01367.x.
The loss of material from specimens of three luting cements was measured after continuous erosion cycling in the laboratory. The glass ionomer luting cement showed significantly less material loss than the zinc polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate luting cements. Two hundred and fifty restorations cemented with one of the three materials were studied clinically for marginal integrity and retention over 3.5 years. The data were tested using survival analysis. Zinc phosphate cement gave the best clinical performance. Possible explanations for the poor correlation between the findings in the laboratory and clinical study are discussed.
在实验室中对三种粘结水门汀的标本进行连续侵蚀循环后,测量了材料损失。玻璃离子粘结水门汀的材料损失明显少于聚羧酸锌和磷酸锌粘结水门汀。临床上对用这三种材料之一粘结的250颗修复体进行了3.5年的边缘完整性和固位情况研究。使用生存分析对数据进行了测试。磷酸锌水门汀的临床性能最佳。讨论了实验室研究结果与临床研究结果之间相关性较差的可能原因。