Suppr超能文献

三种牙科黏固水门汀的实验室与临床评估

A laboratory and clinical evaluation of three dental luting cements.

作者信息

Knibbs P J, Walls A W

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 1989 Sep;16(5):467-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01367.x.

Abstract

The loss of material from specimens of three luting cements was measured after continuous erosion cycling in the laboratory. The glass ionomer luting cement showed significantly less material loss than the zinc polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate luting cements. Two hundred and fifty restorations cemented with one of the three materials were studied clinically for marginal integrity and retention over 3.5 years. The data were tested using survival analysis. Zinc phosphate cement gave the best clinical performance. Possible explanations for the poor correlation between the findings in the laboratory and clinical study are discussed.

摘要

在实验室中对三种粘结水门汀的标本进行连续侵蚀循环后,测量了材料损失。玻璃离子粘结水门汀的材料损失明显少于聚羧酸锌和磷酸锌粘结水门汀。临床上对用这三种材料之一粘结的250颗修复体进行了3.5年的边缘完整性和固位情况研究。使用生存分析对数据进行了测试。磷酸锌水门汀的临床性能最佳。讨论了实验室研究结果与临床研究结果之间相关性较差的可能原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验