Cullington H E, Bele D, Brinton J C, Cooper S, Daft M, Harding J, Hatton N, Humphries J, Lutman M E, Maddocks J, Maggs J, Millward K, O'Donoghue G, Patel S, Rajput K, Salmon V, Sear T, Speers A, Wheeler A, Wilson K
a University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service , Southampton , UK.
b St Thomas' Hospital Hearing Implant Centre , London , UK.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Jan;18(1):23-35. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1265189. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
This fourteen-centre project used professional rating scales and parent questionnaires to assess longitudinal outcomes in a large non-selected population of children receiving simultaneous and sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
This was an observational non-randomized service evaluation. Data were collected at four time points: before bilateral cochlear implants or before the sequential implant, one year, two years, and three years after. The measures reported are Categories of Auditory Performance II (CAPII), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), Bilateral Listening Skills Profile (BLSP) and Parent Outcome Profile (POP).
Thousand and one children aged from 8 months to almost 18 years were involved, although there were many missing data. In children receiving simultaneous implants after one, two, and three years respectively, median CAP scores were 4, 5, and 6; median SIR were 1, 2, and 3. Three years after receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants, 61% of children were reported to understand conversation without lip-reading and 66% had intelligible speech if the listener concentrated hard. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility were significantly better in female children than males. Parents of children using sequential implants were generally positive about their child's well-being and behaviour since receiving the second device; those who were less positive about well-being changes also generally reported their children less willing to wear the second device.
Data from 78% of paediatric cochlear implant centres in the United Kingdom provide a real-world picture of outcomes of children with bilateral implants in the UK. This large reference data set can be used to identify children in the lower quartile for targeted intervention.
这个十四中心项目使用专业评定量表和家长问卷,对大量未经过挑选、同时接受双耳人工耳蜗植入和先后接受双耳人工耳蜗植入的儿童群体的纵向结果进行评估。
这是一项观察性非随机服务评估。在四个时间点收集数据:双耳人工耳蜗植入前或先后植入前、植入后一年、两年和三年。报告的测量指标包括听觉表现类别II(CAPII)、言语清晰度评分(SIR)、双耳听力技能概况(BLSP)和家长结果概况(POP)。
共有1001名年龄从8个月至近18岁的儿童参与,不过存在大量缺失数据。在分别接受同时植入人工耳蜗一年、两年和三年的儿童中,CAP中位数分数分别为4、5和6;SIR中位数分别为1、2和3。在接受双耳同时人工耳蜗植入三年后,据报告61%的儿童无需唇读就能理解对话,若聆听者努力集中注意力,66%的儿童言语清晰易懂。女童的听觉表现和言语清晰度明显优于男童。使用先后植入人工耳蜗的儿童的家长,总体上对孩子自接受第二台设备后的幸福状况和行为持积极态度;那些对幸福状况变化不太积极的家长,通常也表示他们的孩子不太愿意佩戴第二台设备。
来自英国78%的儿科人工耳蜗植入中心的数据,呈现了英国双耳植入儿童的实际结果情况。这个大型参考数据集可用于识别处于下四分位数的儿童,以便进行有针对性的干预。