From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 301, Hock Plaza, Durham, NC 27705.
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):333-347. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160749.
Costs direct decisions that influence the effectiveness of radiology in the care of patients on a daily basis. Yet many radiologists struggle to harness the power of cost measurement and cost management as a critical path toward establishing their value in patient care. When radiologists cannot articulate their value, they risk losing control over how imaging is delivered and supported. In the United States, recent payment trends directing value-based payments for bundles of care advance the imperative for radiology providers to articulate their value. This begins with the development of an understanding of the providers' own costs, as well as the complex interrelationships and imaging-associated costs of other participants across the imaging value chain. Controlling the costs of imaging necessitates understanding them at a procedural level and quantifying the costs of delivering specific imaging services. Effective product-level costing is dependent on a bottom-up approach, which is supported through recent innovations in time-dependent activity-based costing. Once the costs are understood, they can be managed. Within the high fixed cost and high overhead cost environment of health care provider organizations, stakeholders must understand the implications of misaligned top-down cost management approaches that can both paradoxically shift effort from low-cost workers to much costlier professionals and allocate overhead costs counterproductively. Radiology's engagement across a broad spectrum of care provides an excellent opportunity for radiology providers to take a leading role within the health care organizations to enhance value and margin through principled and effective cost management. Following a discussion of the rationale for measuring costs, this review contextualizes costs from the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders (relativity), discusses core concepts in how costs are classified (rudiments), presents common and improved methods for measuring costs in health care, and discusses how cost management strategies can either improve or hinder high-value health care (realities). RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
成本直接影响放射科在日常患者护理中的效率,因此,放射科医生必须做出相关决策。然而,许多放射科医生在利用成本衡量和成本管理的力量方面仍存在困难,而这是他们在患者护理中建立自身价值的关键途径。如果放射科医生无法清楚地表达自身的价值,他们可能会失去对影像服务提供和支持的控制。在美国,最近的支付趋势要求根据护理包提供基于价值的支付,这就推动了放射科医生阐明其价值的必要性。这首先需要了解提供者自身的成本,以及影像价值链中其他参与者之间的复杂相互关系和与影像相关的成本。控制影像成本需要在程序层面上了解这些成本,并量化提供特定影像服务的成本。有效的产品级成本核算取决于自下而上的方法,而最近基于时间的作业成本核算方面的创新为这种方法提供了支持。一旦了解了成本,就可以对其进行管理。在医疗服务提供商组织的高固定成本和高间接成本环境中,利益相关者必须了解成本管理方法不匹配的影响,这种方法可能会自相矛盾地将工作从低成本员工转移到成本更高的专业人员身上,并产生适得其反的间接成本分配。放射科在广泛的医疗护理领域的参与为放射科医生提供了一个极好的机会,可以在医疗保健组织中发挥主导作用,通过有原则和有效的成本管理来提高价值和利润率。在讨论了衡量成本的基本原理之后,本文从各种利益相关者的角度(相对性)来阐述成本,讨论了成本分类的核心概念(基础知识),介绍了医疗保健中常见和改进的成本衡量方法,并讨论了成本管理策略如何提高或阻碍高价值的医疗保健(现实情况)。RSNA,2017 在线补充材料可在此文章中查看。