• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对北卡罗来纳州新烧伤登记处的评估。

Evaluation of the New North Carolina Burn Registry.

作者信息

Chrisco Lori, Travers Debbie, Grant Ernest J

机构信息

From the *North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and †School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):e765-e771. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000483.

DOI:10.1097/BCR.0000000000000483
PMID:28099238
Abstract

High-quality burn registries can facilitate best practices in burn treatment, patient education, and research. A new burn registry was designed and implemented at the North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center in June 2013. The primary goals for the design of the new North Carolina (NC) burn registry were to improve reporting to the American Burn Association's National Burn Repository while maintaining current functionality and preserving previously collected data. The objective of this evaluation was to review the literature for best practices in designing a disease registry, benchmark the design of the NC burn registry with the best practices identified in the literature, and compare data quality before and after implementation of the new NC burn registry. The NC burn registry was evaluated using six measurable elements identified from essential indicators of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality user's guide for design, implementation, analysis, interpretation, and quality evaluation of registries. These elements were achieving objectives, using literature to inform the choice of data elements, improving completeness of information, employing consistency checks, providing clear, operational definitions of outcomes and other data elements, and minimizing active data collection. Five of the six chosen essential elements were found to have been met during the evaluation of the new NC burn registry. One essential element, improving completeness of information, had mixed results. The new NC burn registry improved reporting to the National Burn Repository while maintaining current functionality and preserving previously collected data.

摘要

高质量的烧伤登记系统有助于在烧伤治疗、患者教育和研究方面推行最佳实践。2013年6月,北卡罗来纳州杰西青年烧伤中心设计并实施了一个新的烧伤登记系统。新的北卡罗来纳州(NC)烧伤登记系统设计的主要目标是在保持现有功能和保留先前收集的数据的同时,改进向美国烧伤协会国家烧伤资料库的报告。本次评估的目的是查阅有关疾病登记系统设计最佳实践的文献,将NC烧伤登记系统的设计与文献中确定的最佳实践进行对比,并比较新的NC烧伤登记系统实施前后的数据质量。使用从医疗保健研究与质量局登记系统设计、实施、分析、解释和质量评估用户指南的基本指标中确定的六个可衡量要素对NC烧伤登记系统进行评估。这些要素包括实现目标、利用文献为数据要素的选择提供依据、提高信息完整性、采用一致性检查、为结果和其他数据要素提供清晰的操作定义,以及尽量减少主动数据收集。在对新的NC烧伤登记系统的评估中,发现六个选定的基本要素中有五个得到了满足。一个基本要素,即提高信息完整性,结果好坏参半。新的NC烧伤登记系统在保持现有功能和保留先前收集的数据的同时,改进了向国家烧伤资料库的报告。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the New North Carolina Burn Registry.对北卡罗来纳州新烧伤登记处的评估。
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):e765-e771. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000483.
2
National Burn Repository 2005: a ten-year review.2005年国家烧伤资料库:十年回顾
J Burn Care Res. 2006 Jul-Aug;27(4):411-36. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000226260.17523.22.
3
An assessment of the completeness of the Massachusetts Burn Registry.马萨诸塞州烧伤登记处完整性评估。
Public Health Rep. 1983 Sep-Oct;98(5):492-6.
4
A validity review of the National Burn Repository.国家烧伤资料库的效度审查。
J Burn Care Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):274-80. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182642b46.
5
Adherence to burn center referral criteria: are patients appropriately being referred?对烧伤中心转诊标准的依从性:患者是否得到了恰当的转诊?
J Burn Care Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):26-30. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181cb8efb.
6
Epidemiology of burn injuries presenting to North Carolina emergency departments in 2006-2007.2006 - 2007年北卡罗来纳州急诊科收治的烧伤患者流行病学情况
Burns. 2009 Sep;35(6):776-82. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.012. Epub 2009 May 30.
7
Examining national burn care policies--is the Israeli burn care alignment based on national data?审视国家烧伤护理政策——以色列的烧伤护理情况是否与全国数据相符?
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):510-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31824d1c09.
8
American Burn Association (ABA) Burn Care Quality Platform (BCQP) and Large Data Set Analysis Considerations: A Practical Guide to Investigating Clinical Questions in Burns via Large Data Sets.美国烧伤协会(ABA)烧伤护理质量平台(BCQP)和大数据集分析考虑因素:通过大数据集调查烧伤临床问题的实用指南。
J Burn Care Res. 2024 May 6;45(3):557-564. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad049.
9
Burn Registries State of Affairs: A Scoping review.烧伤登记处现状:范围综述。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Sep 1;43(5):1002-1014. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac077.
10
Process evaluation of software using the international classification of external causes of injuries for collecting burn injury data at burn centers in the United States.在美国烧伤中心使用国际损伤外部原因分类法收集烧伤损伤数据的软件过程评估。
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):28-40. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a3aaaa.