Santos Gabriela Lopes Dos, Souza Matheus Bragança, Desloovere Kaat, Russo Thiago Luiz
Laboratory of Neurological Physiotherapy Research, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170368. eCollection 2017.
Elastic tape has been widely used in clinical practice in order to improve upper limb (UL) sensibility. However, there is little evidence that supports this type of intervention in stroke patients.
To verify the effect of elastic tape, applied to the paretic shoulder, on joint position sense (JPS) during abduction and flexion in subjects with chronic hemiparesis compared to sham tape (non-elastic tape). Furthermore, to verify if this potential effect is correlated to shoulder subluxation measurements and sensorimotor impairment.
A crossover and sham-controlled study was conducted with post-stroke patients who were randomly allocated into two groups: 1) those who received Sham Tape (ST) first and after one month they received Elastic Tape (ET); 2) those who received Elastic Tape (ET) first and after one month they received Sham Tape (ST). The JPS was evaluated using a dynamometer. The absolute error for shoulder abduction and flexion at 30° and 60° was calculated. Sensorimotor impairment was determined by Fugl-Meyer, and shoulder subluxation was measured using a caliper.
Thirteen hemiparetic subjects (average time since stroke 75.23 months) participated in the study. At baseline (before interventions), the groups were not different for abduction at 30° (p = 0.805; p = 0.951), and 60° (p = 0.509; p = 0.799), or flexion at 30° (p = 0.872; p = 0.897) and 60° (p = 0.853; p = 0.970). For the ET group, differences between pre and post-elastic tape for abduction at 30° (p<0.010) and 60° (p<0.010), and flexion at 30° p<0.010) and 60° (p<0.010) were observed. For the ST group, differences were also observed between pre and post-elastic tape for abduction at 30° (p<0.010) and 60° (p<0.010), and flexion at 30° (p<0.010,) and 60° (p<0.010). Potential effects were only correlated with shoulder subluxation during abduction at 30° (p = 0.001, r = -0.92) and 60° (p = 0.020, r = -0.75).
Elastic tape improved shoulder JPS of subjects with chronic hemiparesis regardless of the level of UL sensorimotor impairment. However, this improvement was influenced by the subluxation degree at abduction.
弹力带已在临床实践中广泛应用,以提高上肢(UL)的感觉功能。然而,几乎没有证据支持这种干预措施对中风患者有效。
与假弹力带(非弹性胶带)相比,验证应用于偏瘫肩部的弹力带对慢性偏瘫患者外展和屈曲过程中关节位置觉(JPS)的影响。此外,验证这种潜在影响是否与肩关节半脱位测量值和感觉运动障碍相关。
对中风后患者进行了一项交叉和假对照研究,这些患者被随机分为两组:1)先接受假弹力带(ST),一个月后接受弹力带(ET)的患者;2)先接受弹力带(ET),一个月后接受假弹力带(ST)的患者。使用测力计评估关节位置觉。计算30°和60°时肩部外展和屈曲的绝对误差。通过Fugl-Meyer评估感觉运动障碍,并使用卡尺测量肩关节半脱位。
13名偏瘫患者(中风后平均时间75.23个月)参与了该研究。在基线(干预前)时,两组在30°(p = 0.805;p = 0.951)和60°(p = 0.509;p = 0.799)外展,或30°(p = 0.872;p = 0.897)和60°(p = 0.853;p = 0.970)屈曲方面无差异。对于ET组,观察到弹力带前后在30°(p<0.010)和60°(p<0.010)外展,以及30°(p<0.010)和60°(p<0.010)屈曲方面的差异。对于ST组,在弹力带前后在30°(p<0.010)和60°(p<0.010)外展,以及30°(p<0.010)和60°(p<0.010)屈曲方面也观察到差异。潜在影响仅与30°(p = 0.001,r = -0.92)和60°(p = 0.020,r = -0.75)外展时的肩关节半脱位相关。
弹力带改善了慢性偏瘫患者的肩部关节位置觉,无论上肢感觉运动障碍程度如何。然而,这种改善受外展时半脱位程度的影响。