Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;118(2):190-199. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew446.
In a post hoc analysis of the ENIGMA-II trial, we sought to determine whether intraoperative dexamethasone was associated with adverse safety outcomes.
Inverse probability weighting with estimated propensity scores was used to determine the association of dexamethasone administration with postoperative infection, quality of recovery, and adverse safety outcomes for 5499 of the 7112 non-cardiac surgery subjects enrolled in ENIGMA-II.
Dexamethasone was administered to 2178 (40%) of the 5499 subjects included in this analysis and was not associated with wound infection [189 (8.7%) vs 275 (8.3%); propensity score-adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.34; P=0.38], severe postoperative nausea and vomiting on day 1 [242 (7.3%) vs 189 (8.7%); propensity score-adjusted RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.86-1.30; P=0.59], quality of recovery score [median 14, interquartile range (IQR) 12-15, vs median 14, IQR 12-16, P=0.10), length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit [propensity score-adjusted median (IQR) 2.0 (1.3, 2.9) vs 1.9 (1.3, 3.1), P=0.60], or the primary outcome of the main trial. Dexamethasone administration was associated with a decrease in fever on days 1-3 [182 (8.4%) vs 488 (14.7%); RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.5-0.74; P<0.001] and shorter lengths of stay in hospital [propensity score-adjusted median (IQR) 5.0 (2.9, 8.2) vs 5.3 (3.1, 9.1), P<0.001]. Neither diabetes mellitus nor surgical wound contamination status altered these outcomes.
Dexamethasone administration to high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients did not increase the risk of postoperative wound infection or other adverse events up to day 30, and appears to be safe in patients either with or without diabetes mellitus.
NCT00430989.
在 ENIGMA-II 试验的事后分析中,我们试图确定术中使用地塞米松是否与不良安全结局相关。
使用估计倾向评分的逆概率加权来确定在 ENIGMA-II 中纳入的 7112 例非心脏手术患者中的 5499 例患者中,地塞米松给药与术后感染、恢复质量和不良安全结局之间的关联。
在本分析中包括的 5499 例患者中,有 2178 例(40%)接受了地塞米松治疗,与伤口感染无关[189(8.7%)与 275(8.3%);倾向评分调整后的相对风险(RR)1.10;95%置信区间(CI)0.89-1.34;P=0.38]、第 1 天严重术后恶心和呕吐[242(7.3%)与 189(8.7%);倾向评分调整后的 RR 1.06;95%CI 0.86-1.30;P=0.59]、恢复质量评分[中位数 14,四分位距(IQR)12-15,与中位数 14,IQR 12-16,P=0.10]、麻醉后护理单位的住院时间[倾向评分调整后的中位数(IQR)2.0(1.3,2.9)与 1.9(1.3,3.1),P=0.60]或主要试验的主要结局。地塞米松治疗与第 1-3 天发热减少有关[182(8.4%)与 488(14.7%);RR 0.61;95%CI 0.5-0.74;P<0.001]和住院时间缩短[倾向评分调整后的中位数(IQR)5.0(2.9,8.2)与 5.3(3.1,9.1),P<0.001]。糖尿病或手术伤口污染状态均未改变这些结果。
给高危非心脏手术患者使用地塞米松并未增加术后伤口感染或其他不良事件的风险,在有或没有糖尿病的患者中似乎是安全的。
NCT00430989。