Suppr超能文献

血管内治疗中“点滴转运”与“母舰转运”的比较:为实现最佳结果模拟最佳转运方案

Drip 'n Ship Versus Mothership for Endovascular Treatment: Modeling the Best Transportation Options for Optimal Outcomes.

作者信息

Milne Matthew S W, Holodinsky Jessalyn K, Hill Michael D, Nygren Anders, Qiu Chao, Goyal Mayank, Kamal Noreen

机构信息

From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (M.S.W.M., A.N.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute (M.D.H., N.K.), Departments of Medicine, Radiology and Community Health Sciences (M.D.H., M.G.), and Departments of Community Health Sciences (J.K.H., M.D.H.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (C.Q.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2017 Mar;48(3):791-794. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015321. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is uncertainty regarding the best way for patients outside of endovascular-capable or Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSC) to access endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The role of the nonendovascular-capable Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) that can offer thrombolysis with alteplase but not endovascular treatment is unclear. A key question is whether average benefit is greater with early thrombolysis at the closest PSC before transportation to the CSC (Drip 'n Ship) or with PSC bypass and direct transport to the CSC (Mothership). Ideal transportation options were mapped based on the location of their endovascular-capable CSCs and nonendovascular-capable PSCs.

METHODS

Probability models for endovascular treatment were developed from the ESCAPE trial's (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times) decay curves and for alteplase treatment were extracted from the Get With The Guidelines decay curve. The time on-scene, needle-to-door-out time at the PSC, door-to-needle time at the CSC, and door-to-reperfusion time were assumed constant at 25, 20, 30, and 115 minutes, respectively. Emergency medical services transportation times were calculated using Google's Distance Matrix Application Programming Interface interfaced with MATLAB's Mapping Toolbox to create map visualizations.

RESULTS

Maps were generated for multiple onset-to-first medical response times and door-to-needle times at the PSCs of 30, 60, and 90. These figures demonstrate the transportation option that yields the better modeled outcome in specific regions. The probability of good outcome is shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Drip 'n Ship demonstrates that a PSC that is in close proximity to a CSC remains significant only when the PSC is able to achieve a door-to-needle time of ≤30 minutes when the CSC is also efficient.

摘要

背景与目的

对于血管内治疗能力不足的患者或非综合卒中中心(CSC)的患者而言,获得急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的最佳方式尚不确定。能够提供阿替普酶溶栓但不能进行血管内治疗的非血管内治疗能力的初级卒中中心(PSC)的作用尚不清楚。一个关键问题是,在转运至CSC之前,在距离最近的PSC进行早期溶栓(边滴注边转运)还是绕过PSC直接转运至CSC(母舰模式),平均获益更大。基于其血管内治疗能力的CSC和非血管内治疗能力的PSC的位置绘制了理想的转运方案。

方法

血管内治疗的概率模型是根据ESCAPE试验(针对小梗死核心和前循环近端闭塞的血管内治疗,重点是尽量缩短CT至再通时间)的衰减曲线建立的,阿替普酶治疗的概率模型是从“遵循指南”衰减曲线中提取的。现场时间、PSC的穿刺到出门时间、CSC的进门到穿刺时间和进门到再灌注时间分别假定为恒定的25分钟、20分钟、30分钟和115分钟。使用谷歌距离矩阵应用程序编程接口与MATLAB绘图工具箱接口计算紧急医疗服务转运时间,以创建地图可视化。

结果

针对30、60和90分钟的多个发病至首次医疗响应时间以及PSC的进门到穿刺时间生成了地图。这些图展示了在特定区域产生更好模拟结果的转运方案。显示了良好预后的概率。

结论

边滴注边转运表明,只有当CSC效率较高且PSC能够实现进门到穿刺时间≤30分钟时,靠近CSC的PSC才具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验