Suppr超能文献

非霍奇金淋巴瘤中CBV、BEAM和BEAC大剂量化疗后自体造血干细胞移植的比较:疗效与毒性

Comparison of CBV, BEAM and BEAC high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Efficacy and toxicity.

作者信息

Shi Youwu, Liu Peng, Zhou Shengyu, Yang Jianliang, Han Xiaohong, He Xiaohui, Zhang Changgong, Gui Lin, Qin Yan, Yang Sheng, Zhao Liya, Yao Jiarui, Jia Bo, Zhang Shuxiang, Sun Yan, Shi Yuankai

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;13(5):e423-e429. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12610. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Abstract

AIM

Limited data are available to guide the choice of conditioning regimen before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for patients with lymphoma.

METHODS

We analyzed 129 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who underwent AHSCT from 1996 to 2013 using the most common regimens: CBV (cyclophosphamide, carmustine and etoposide; n = 16), BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan; n = 36) and BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and cyclophosphamide; n = 77).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 42.5 months, the estimated 5-year overall survival for the CBV, BEAM and BEAC groups was 68.8%, 77.8% and 81.8%, respectively (P = 0.584). The estimated 5-year progression-free survival in the CBV group (43.8%) was relatively inferior to the BEAM (66.7%) and BEAC (67.5%) groups, but the differences were not significant (P = 0.403). Grade 2 or higher mucositis, diarrhea and fever were relatively more common in the BEAM group (P < 0.05). No differences were observed in the time to hematopoietic recovery and the duration of hospitalization. The amount of transfused platelet was significantly less in the CBV.

CONCLUSION

CBV, BEAM and BEAC regimens are all optional high-dose chemotherapy before AHSCT for NHL patients.

摘要

目的

关于淋巴瘤患者自体造血干细胞移植(AHSCT)前预处理方案的选择,可用数据有限。

方法

我们分析了1996年至2013年期间接受AHSCT的129例非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,采用最常见的方案:CBV(环磷酰胺、卡莫司汀和依托泊苷;n = 16)、BEAM(卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷和美法仑;n = 36)和BEAC(卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷和环磷酰胺;n = 77)。

结果

中位随访42.5个月时,CBV、BEAM和BEAC组的估计5年总生存率分别为68.8%、77.8%和81.8%(P = 0.584)。CBV组的估计5年无进展生存率(43.8%)相对低于BEAM组(66.7%)和BEAC组(67.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.403)。2级或更高等级的粘膜炎、腹泻和发热在BEAM组中相对更常见(P < 0.05)。造血恢复时间和住院时间无差异。CBV组输注的血小板量明显较少。

结论

CBV、BEAM和BEAC方案都是NHL患者AHSCT前可选的大剂量化疗方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验