Olmos José M, Hernández José L, Martínez Josefina, Pariente Emilio, Castillo Jesús, Prieto-Alhambra Daniel, González-Macías Jesús
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla s/n. 39008, Santander, Spain.
Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Envejecimiento y Fragilidad (RETICEF), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Santander, Spain.
J Bone Miner Metab. 2018 Jan;36(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s00774-017-0812-0. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of densitometric osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in Spanish men aged ≥50 years, and to study how the relationship between them may change depending on how osteoporosis is diagnosed. A community-based population of 1003 men aged ≥50 years was studied. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip. Vertebral fractures were assessed by lateral thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs. The prevalence of osteoporosis was estimated with both the World Health Organization (WHO) (T-score of <-2.5 at the femoral neck, calculated using the young white female normal reference database) and the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria (T-score of <-2.5 at the femoral neck, total hip or lumbar spine, calculated using the young white male normal reference database). The prevalence of osteoporosis using the WHO criterion was 1.1% and using the NOF criterion was 13%, while that of vertebral fractures was 21.3%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the relationship between BMD and vertebral fracture prevalence was 0.64. The odds ratio for osteoporosis using the WHO definition was 2.57 (p = 0.13), and 1.78 (p = 0.007) using the NOF definition. Vertebral fracture prevalence rose with age. The prevalence of osteoporosis increased only moderately in men aged >70 years with the WHO criterion, and showed no change using the NOF definition. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Spanish men using the WHO definition is too small to have any meaningful clinical use. Although the figure is higher using the NOF definition, it would seem that population-based studies of BMD in men are of questionable value.
本研究旨在评估年龄≥50岁的西班牙男性中骨密度测定骨质疏松症和椎体骨折的患病率,并研究它们之间的关系如何根据骨质疏松症的诊断方式而变化。对1003名年龄≥50岁的社区男性人群进行了研究。通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量腰椎、股骨颈和全髋部的骨密度。通过胸部和腰椎侧位X线片评估椎体骨折情况。采用世界卫生组织(WHO)标准(使用年轻白人女性正常参考数据库计算,股骨颈T值<-2.5)和美国国家骨质疏松基金会(NOF)标准(使用年轻白人男性正常参考数据库计算,股骨颈、全髋部或腰椎T值<-2.5)评估骨质疏松症的患病率。采用WHO标准时骨质疏松症的患病率为1.1%,采用NOF标准时为13%,而椎体骨折的患病率为21.3%。骨密度与椎体骨折患病率之间关系的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.64。采用WHO定义时骨质疏松症的比值比为2.57(p = 0.13),采用NOF定义时为1.78(p = 0.007)。椎体骨折患病率随年龄增长而上升。采用WHO标准时,年龄>70岁男性的骨质疏松症患病率仅适度增加,而采用NOF定义时无变化。采用WHO定义时,西班牙男性骨质疏松症的患病率过低,无任何有意义的临床用途。尽管采用NOF定义时该数字较高,但基于人群的男性骨密度研究的价值似乎值得怀疑。