• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性随机对照研究的主要结果:卒中后的发病率和死亡率——依普罗沙坦与尼群地平用于二级预防的比较(MOSES)。

Principal Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Study: Morbidity and Mortality after Stroke - Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention (MOSES).

作者信息

Lüders Stephan

机构信息

St Josefs Hospital, Cloppenburg, Germany, s.lueders@ kh-clp.de.

出版信息

J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2005 Mar;6(1_suppl):S12-S15. doi: 10.1177/14703203050060010401.

DOI:10.1177/14703203050060010401
PMID:28102746
Abstract

The morbidity and mortality after stroke - eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention (MOSES) trial compared the effects of two antihypertensive agents in secondary prevention of stroke. The hypothesis of the trial was that in hypertensive stroke patients, for the same level of blood pressure (BP) control, eprosartan would be more effective than nitrendipine in reducing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A total of 710 patients were assigned to an eprosartan-based regimen and 695 to a nitrendipine-based regimen.These patients had hypertension requiring treatment and documented cerebral ischaemia or haemorrhage. They were well matched at baseline in general characteristics, BP and concomitant disease. BP was lowered to the same extent in both treatment arms, with a very similar timeframe. A high proportion of patients in both treatment arms achieved target BP. The combined primary endpoint was a composite of total mortality and total number of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, including recurrent events.There were 206 endpoints in the eprosartan group and 255 endpoints in the nitrendipine group.This represents a statistically significant 21% risk reduction in favour of eprosartan. Eprosartan also had advantages over nitrendipine in respect of all cerebrovascular events and first cardiovascular events.

摘要

卒中后发病率和死亡率——依普罗沙坦与尼群地平用于二级预防比较(MOSES)试验比较了两种抗高血压药物在卒中二级预防中的效果。该试验的假设是,在高血压卒中患者中,对于相同的血压(BP)控制水平,依普罗沙坦在降低脑血管和心血管发病率及死亡率方面比尼群地平更有效。共有710例患者被分配到以依普罗沙坦为基础的治疗方案组,695例患者被分配到以尼群地平为基础的治疗方案组。这些患者患有需要治疗的高血压且有脑缺血或出血的记录。他们在基线时的一般特征、血压和伴随疾病方面匹配良好。两个治疗组的血压均在相似的时间范围内降低到相同程度。两个治疗组中很大一部分患者达到了目标血压。联合主要终点是总死亡率与心血管和脑血管事件总数(包括复发事件)的综合指标。依普罗沙坦组有206个终点事件,尼群地平组有255个终点事件。这表明依普罗沙坦在统计学上有显著优势,风险降低了21%。在所有脑血管事件和首次心血管事件方面,依普罗沙坦也比尼群地平有优势。

相似文献

1
Principal Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Study: Morbidity and Mortality after Stroke - Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention (MOSES).一项前瞻性随机对照研究的主要结果:卒中后的发病率和死亡率——依普罗沙坦与尼群地平用于二级预防的比较(MOSES)。
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2005 Mar;6(1_suppl):S12-S15. doi: 10.1177/14703203050060010401.
2
Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES).卒中后发病率和死亡率,依普罗沙坦与尼群地平用于二级预防的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究(MOSES)的主要结果
Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1218-26. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000166048.35740.a9. Epub 2005 May 5.
3
Cost-utility analysis of eprosartan compared to enalapril in primary prevention and nitrendipine in secondary prevention in Europe--the HEALTH model.欧洲原发性预防中依普罗沙坦与依那普利以及继发性预防中尼群地平的成本效用分析——HEALTH模型
Value Health. 2009 Sep;12(6):857-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00507.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
4
[AII antagonists in the treatment of hypertension and prevention of CVA].[AII拮抗剂在高血压治疗及预防脑血管意外中的应用]
Vnitr Lek. 2013 Jan;59(1):71-8.
5
Risk reduction by preventing stroke: need for blockade of angiotensin II and catecholamines?通过预防中风降低风险:是否需要阻断血管紧张素II和儿茶酚胺?
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Nov;23 Suppl 5:S25-9. doi: 10.1185/030079907X260737.
6
Antihypertensive treatment and stroke prevention: are angiotensin receptor blockers superior to other antihypertensive agents?抗高血压治疗与中风预防:血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是否优于其他抗高血压药物?
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Jun;3(3):197-204. doi: 10.1177/1753944709104164. Epub 2009 May 14.
7
Morbidity and mortality after stroke--eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES).卒中后发病率和死亡率——依普罗沙坦与尼群地平用于二级预防的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究(MOSES)的主要结果
Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):335-6; author reply 338. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199659.31103.d2. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
8
Observational Study on Cognitive function And systolic blood pressure Reduction (OSCAR): preliminary analysis of 6-month data from > 10,000 patients and review of the literature.认知功能与收缩压降低的观察性研究(OSCAR):对10000多名患者6个月数据的初步分析及文献综述
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Nov;23 Suppl 5:S13-8. doi: 10.1185/030079907X260719.
9
Angiotensin receptor blockers and secondary stroke prevention: the MOSES study.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与继发性卒中预防:MOSES研究
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009 May;7(5):459-64. doi: 10.1586/erc.09.3.
10
Dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers for antihypertensive treatment in older patients--evidence from the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂用于老年患者的降压治疗——来自欧洲收缩期高血压试验的证据
S Afr Med J. 2001 Dec;91(12):1060-8.