McInnes Susan, Peters Kath, Bonney Andrew, Halcomb Elizabeth
University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nurse Res. 2017 Jan 23;24(3):36-41. doi: 10.7748/nr.2017.e1509.
Background Before beginning any research project, novice researchers must consider which methodological approach will best address their research questions. The paucity of literature describing a practical application of naturalistic inquiry adds to the difficulty they may experience. Aim To provide a practical example of how naturalistic inquiry was applied to a qualitative study exploring collaboration between registered nurses and general practitioners working in Australian general practice. Discussion Naturalistic inquiry is not without its critics and limitations. However, by applying the axioms and operational characteristics of naturalistic inquiry, the authors captured a detailed 'snapshot' of collaboration in general practice in the time and context that it occurred. Conclusion Using qualitative methods, naturalistic inquiry provides the scope to construct a comprehensive and contextual understanding of a phenomenon. No individual positivist paradigm could provide the level of detail achieved in a naturalistic inquiry. Implications for practice This paper presents a practical example of naturalistic inquiry for the novice researcher. It shows that naturalistic inquiry is appropriate when the researcher seeks a rich and contextual understanding of a phenomenon as it exists in its natural setting.
背景 在开始任何研究项目之前,新手研究人员必须考虑哪种方法论方法最能解决他们的研究问题。描述自然主义探究实际应用的文献匮乏,这增加了他们可能遇到的困难。
目的 提供一个实际例子,说明自然主义探究如何应用于一项定性研究,该研究探讨了澳大利亚全科医疗中注册护士与全科医生之间的合作。
讨论 自然主义探究并非没有批评者和局限性。然而,通过应用自然主义探究的公理和操作特征,作者捕捉到了全科医疗中合作在其发生的时间和背景下的详细“快照”。
结论 运用定性方法,自然主义探究提供了对一种现象构建全面且情境化理解的范围。没有任何单一的实证主义范式能够提供自然主义探究所达到的细节程度。
对实践的启示 本文为新手研究人员提供了一个自然主义探究的实际例子。它表明,当研究人员寻求对自然环境中存在的现象进行丰富且情境化的理解时,自然主义探究是合适的。