Ding S, Lin F, Marshall A P, Gillespie B M
Clinical Nurse, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; and Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service.
Senior Lecturer, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service; and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia.
J Wound Care. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):28-37. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.28.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are serious postoperative complications that may lead to undesired patient outcomes. Previous research has used survey and chart audit methods to describe wound care practices. However, little research has been published using contemporaneous observations to describe the surgical wound management practices of nurses. The aim of this study was to prospectively describe surgical nurses' postoperative wound care practices and the extent to which observed surgical wound practices aligned with evidence-based guideline recommendations.
In this cross-sectional prospective study, we observed a convenience sample of 60 nurses from four surgical units using a specifically developed observational audit tool. Inter-rater reliability for this tool was assessed during the observation period.
Of 60 observed episodes of wound care, post-procedure hand hygiene (n=49, 81.7%) was less evident compared with pre-procedure hand hygiene practice (n=57, 95%). Over one-third of nurses observed did not correctly use clean gloves (n=16, 38.1%) and one in five did not properly use sterile gloves (n=4, 22%). More than half of surgical nurses (n=37, 61.7%) did not educate patients on post-discharge wound management. Fewer than a quarter (n=14, 23.3%) of wound care events were recorded on both wound assessment charts and patients' progress notes. Inter-rater reliability testing indicated good agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.859; 95% CI: 0.771-0.923; p<0.0005).
Despite surgical wound care guideline recommendations on aseptic technique compliance, patient education, wound assessment and documentation practices, there is a clear gap between recommended and observed wound care practice. This study highlights an area where clinical practice is not reflective of evidence-based recommendations, suggesting that to minimise SSI as an adverse event, practice should be evaluated and strategies incorporating evidence into practice are explored.
手术部位感染(SSIs)是严重的术后并发症,可能导致患者出现不良后果。以往的研究采用调查和病历审核方法来描述伤口护理实践。然而,很少有研究通过同期观察来描述护士的手术伤口管理实践。本研究的目的是前瞻性地描述外科护士术后伤口护理实践,以及观察到的手术伤口实践与循证指南建议的符合程度。
在这项横断面前瞻性研究中,我们使用专门开发的观察性审核工具,对来自四个外科科室的60名护士进行了便利抽样观察。在观察期间评估了该工具的评分者间信度。
在观察到的60次伤口护理过程中,与术前手部卫生习惯(n = 57,95%)相比,术后手部卫生(n = 49,81.7%)不太明显。超过三分之一的被观察护士未正确使用清洁手套(n = 16,38.1%),五分之一的护士未正确使用无菌手套(n = 4,22%)。超过一半的外科护士(n = 37,61.7%)未对患者进行出院后伤口管理教育。在伤口评估图表和患者病程记录中均记录的伤口护理事件不到四分之一(n = 14,23.3%)。评分者间信度测试显示一致性良好(组内相关系数0.859;95%CI:0.771 - 0.923;p < 0.0005)。
尽管手术伤口护理指南对无菌技术依从性、患者教育、伤口评估和记录实践有建议,但推荐的伤口护理实践与观察到的实践之间存在明显差距。本研究突出了临床实践未反映循证建议的一个领域,表明为了将手术部位感染作为不良事件降至最低,应评估实践并探索将证据纳入实践的策略。