• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非骨水泥型内侧牛津单髁膝关节置换术后结果——透亮线的发生率

Results after Cementless Medial Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement - Incidence of Radiolucent Lines.

作者信息

Panzram Benjamin, Bertlich Ines, Reiner Tobias, Walker Tilman, Hagmann Sébastien, Weber Marc-André, Gotterbarm Tobias

机构信息

Clinic of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0170324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170324. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170324
PMID:28103308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5245886/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Tibial radiolucent lines (RL) are commonly seen in cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). In the postoperative course, they can be misinterpreted as signs of loosening, thus leading to unnecessary revision. Since 2004, a cementless OUKR is available. First studies and registry data have shown equally good clinical results of cementless OUKR compared to the cemented version and a significantly reduced incidence of RL in cementless implants.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study includes the first 30 UKR (27 patients) implanted between 2007 and 2009 with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the OKS, AKS, range of movement (ROM) and level of pain (VAS). Standard radiologic evaluation was performed at three months, one and five years after surgery. The results five years after implantation were compared to a group of 27 cemented Oxford UKR (OUKR) in a matched-pair-analysis.

RESULTS

Tibial RL were seen in 10 implants three months after operation, which significantly decreased to five after one year and to three after five years (p = 0.02). RL did not have a significant influence on revision (p = 1.0) or clinical outcome after five years. RL were always partial, never progressive and strictly limited to the tibia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of tibial RL five years after implantation between cemented and cementless implants (cemented: 4, cementless: 3, p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

After cementless implantation RL were limited to the tibia, partial and never progressive. During short term follow-up the incidence of RL decreased significantly. RL seem to have no influence on clinical outcome and revision.

摘要

目的

胫骨透亮线(RL)在骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术(UKR)中较为常见。在术后过程中,它们可能被误判为松动迹象,从而导致不必要的翻修。自2004年以来,有一种非骨水泥型OUKR可供使用。初步研究和登记数据表明,与骨水泥型相比,非骨水泥型OUKR的临床效果同样良好,且非骨水泥型植入物中RL的发生率显著降低。

方法

这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2007年至2009年间首次植入的30例UKR(27例患者),平均随访5年。使用OKS、AKS、活动范围(ROM)和疼痛程度(VAS)评估临床结果。在术后三个月、一年和五年进行标准的放射学评估。将植入五年后的结果与一组27例骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术(OUKR)进行配对分析。

结果

术后三个月,10枚植入物出现胫骨RL,一年后显著降至5枚,五年后降至3枚(p = 0.02)。RL对五年后的翻修(p = 1.0)或临床结果没有显著影响。RL总是局部的,从不进展,且严格局限于胫骨。骨水泥型和非骨水泥型植入物植入五年后胫骨RL的发生率没有显著差异(骨水泥型:4例,非骨水泥型:3例,p = 1.0)。

结论

非骨水泥植入后,RL局限于胫骨,为局部性且从不进展。在短期随访中,RL的发生率显著下降。RL似乎对临床结果和翻修没有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/866490fde317/pone.0170324.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/d2f1b66e2d0c/pone.0170324.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/9c8f203c913b/pone.0170324.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/01c369e92812/pone.0170324.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/866490fde317/pone.0170324.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/d2f1b66e2d0c/pone.0170324.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/9c8f203c913b/pone.0170324.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/01c369e92812/pone.0170324.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d05/5245886/866490fde317/pone.0170324.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Results after Cementless Medial Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement - Incidence of Radiolucent Lines.非骨水泥型内侧牛津单髁膝关节置换术后结果——透亮线的发生率
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0170324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170324. eCollection 2017.
2
Cementless Oxford medial unicompartimental knee replacement: an independent series with a 5-year-follow-up.非骨水泥型牛津内侧单髁膝关节置换术:一项5年随访的独立研究系列。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jul;137(7):1011-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2696-9. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
3
Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:非指定用户组的早期结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):703-709. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3. Epub 2016 May 9.
4
Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis.一项使用放射立体分析比较骨水泥型和非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术的随机对照试验的五年结果。
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:383-390. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.09.003. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Cementless medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Five-year results from an independent series.非骨水泥型内侧牛津单髁膝关节置换术。独立队列的五年随访结果。
Knee. 2020 Aug;27(4):1219-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术的五年经验
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):694-702. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3879-y. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
Ten-year survival and seven-year functional results of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A prospective consecutive series of our first 1000 cases.非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术的10年生存率及7年功能结果:对我们首批1000例患者的前瞻性连续系列研究。
Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1231-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
8
Cementless Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement-Clinical and Radiological Results of 228 Knees with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.非骨水泥型牛津内侧单髁膝关节置换术——228例膝关节至少随访2年的临床及影像学结果
J Clin Med. 2020 May 14;9(5):1476. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051476.
9
Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.1000 例骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术的 10 年临床和影像学结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1479-1487. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05544-w. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
A Matched Comparison of Implant and Functional Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: A Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man and the Hospital Episode Statistics Patient Reported Outcome Measures Database.水泥固定和非水泥固定单髁膝关节置换的植入物和功能结果的配对比较:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处和医院病例统计患者报告结局测量数据库的研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Sep 4;106(17):1553-1562. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01418. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study.在单髁膝关节置换后比较非骨水泥双钉、骨水泥双钉和骨水泥单钉股骨部件的迁移:一项 5 年随机 RSA 研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Dec;143(12):7169-7183. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:非指定用户组的早期结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):703-709. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3. Epub 2016 May 9.
2
Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术的五年经验
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):694-702. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3879-y. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
3
The five-year radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee arthroplasty.
A structured evaluation of the symptomatic medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).有症状的内侧牛津单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)的结构化评估。
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Oct 19;6(10):850-860. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200105. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Early Results of Oxford Mobile Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) with the Microplasty Instrumentation: An Indian Experience.牛津活动平台内侧单髁膝关节置换术(UKR)联合微型整形器械的早期结果:一项印度经验。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Jul;6(4):301-311.
5
Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement allows early return to normal activity.非骨水泥单髁膝关节置换术可使患者早日恢复正常活动。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 17;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1883-8.
非骨水泥型牛津内侧间室膝关节置换术的五年影像学结果。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Oct;97-B(10):1358-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35668.
4
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: a randomised controlled trial.使用放射立体测量分析对比骨水泥型与非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:一项随机对照试验
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):185-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34331.
5
Cemented versus Uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?骨水泥型与非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:有差异吗?
Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:245915. doi: 10.1155/2013/245915. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
6
Improved fixation in cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.非骨水泥单间室膝关节置换术中固定的改善:一项随机对照试验的五年结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1365-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01005.
7
Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees.骨水泥固定的 Oxford 单髁膝关节置换术:1000 例膝关节的多中心研究。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Feb;95-B(2):181-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30411.
8
Histology of the bone-cement interface in retrieved Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.翻修的牛津单髁膝关节置换术中骨水泥界面的组织学研究。
Knee. 2012 Dec;19(6):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
The early radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee replacement.非骨水泥型牛津内侧膝关节置换术的早期放射学结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Mar;94(3):334-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27407.
10
Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement.活动平台单髁膝关节置换术的不必要禁忌证
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):622-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.26214.