• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰前列腺癌筛查随机研究中机会性前列腺特异性抗原检测的评估。

Estimate of Opportunistic Prostate Specific Antigen Testing in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Urology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland.

出版信息

J Urol. 2017 Jul;198(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.048. Epub 2017 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.048
PMID:28104375
Abstract

PURPOSE

Screening for prostate cancer remains controversial, although ERSPC (European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer) showed a 21% relative reduction in prostate cancer mortality. The Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, which is the largest component of ERSPC, demonstrated a statistically nonsignificant 16% mortality benefit in a separate analysis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the degree of contamination in the control arm of the Finnish trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Altogether 48,295 and 31,872 men were randomized to the control and screening arms, respectively. The screening period was 1996 to 2007. The extent of prostate specific antigen testing was analyzed retrospectively using laboratory databases. The incidence of T1c prostate cancer (impalpable prostate cancer detected by elevated prostate specific antigen) was determined from the national Finnish Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

Approximately 1.4% of men had undergone prostate specific antigen testing 1 to 3 years before randomization. By the first 4, 8 and 12 years of followup 18.1%, 47.7% and 62.7% of men in the control arm had undergone prostate specific antigen testing at least once and in the screening arm the proportions were 69.8%, 81.1% and 85.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of T1c prostate cancer was 6.1% in the screening arm and 4.5% in the control arm (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of men in the control arm had undergone a prostate specific antigen test during the 15-year followup. Contamination is likely to dilute differences in prostate cancer mortality between the arms in the Finnish screening trial.

摘要

目的

尽管 ERSPC(前列腺癌筛查的欧洲随机研究)显示前列腺癌死亡率相对降低了 21%,但前列腺癌筛查仍存在争议。芬兰前列腺癌筛查随机研究是 ERSPC 的最大组成部分,其单独分析显示死亡率有统计学上无显著意义的 16%获益。本研究旨在估计芬兰试验对照组的污染程度。

材料和方法

共有 48295 名和 31872 名男性分别随机分配到对照组和筛查组。筛查期为 1996 年至 2007 年。使用实验室数据库回顾性分析前列腺特异性抗原检测的程度。通过全国芬兰癌症登记处确定 T1c 前列腺癌(由升高的前列腺特异性抗原检测到的无法触及的前列腺癌)的发病率。

结果

大约 1.4%的男性在随机分组前 1 至 3 年内进行了前列腺特异性抗原检测。在对照组的前 4、8 和 12 年随访中,分别有 18.1%、47.7%和 62.7%的男性至少进行了一次前列腺特异性抗原检测,而在筛查组中,这一比例分别为 69.8%、81.1%和 85.2%。筛查组的 T1c 前列腺癌累积发病率为 6.1%,对照组为 4.5%(RR 1.21,95%CI 1.13-1.30)。

结论

在 15 年的随访中,对照组中有很大一部分男性接受了前列腺特异性抗原检测。污染可能会稀释芬兰筛查试验中两组之间前列腺癌死亡率的差异。

相似文献

1
Estimate of Opportunistic Prostate Specific Antigen Testing in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.芬兰前列腺癌筛查随机研究中机会性前列腺特异性抗原检测的评估。
J Urol. 2017 Jul;198(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.048. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
2
Number of Screening Rounds and Postscreening Prostate Cancer Incidence: Results from the Finnish Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Study.筛查轮数与前列腺癌筛查后的发病率:芬兰参与的前列腺癌筛查欧洲随机研究的结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Sep;70(3):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
3
4
Prostate cancer mortality in the Finnish randomized screening trial.芬兰随机筛选试验中的前列腺癌死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 15;105(10):719-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt038. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
5
Long-term prostate-specific antigen contamination in the Spanish arm of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)西班牙分部的长期前列腺特异性抗原污染情况。
Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Apr;40(3):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up: Results of the French section of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).对照组的污染导致基于 PSA 的筛查对 9 年随访时前列腺癌死亡率没有影响:前列腺癌筛查的欧洲随机研究(ERSPC)法国分部的结果。
Prog Urol. 2020 Apr;30(5):252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
7
Could Differences in Treatment Between Trial Arms Explain the Reduction in Prostate Cancer Mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer?试验组间治疗差异能否解释前列腺癌筛查的欧洲随机研究中前列腺癌死亡率的降低?
Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究鹿特丹部分中的有效前列腺特异性抗原污染情况。
Int J Cancer. 2003 Jun 20;105(3):394-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11074.
9
Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: a review of current evidence.用前列腺特异性抗原检测进行前列腺癌筛查:当前证据回顾。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1143-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2085.
10
Extent of prostate-specific antigen contamination in the Spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)西班牙部分中前列腺特异性抗原污染的程度。
Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1234-40; discussion 1239-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for low-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study within the FinRSPC trial.低风险前列腺癌的危险因素:芬兰前列腺癌筛查随机试验中的一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Nov 15;157(10):2033-2040. doi: 10.1002/ijc.70026. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
2
Prostate cancer screening in Europe: future directions and perspectives.欧洲的前列腺癌筛查:未来方向与展望。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00989-2.
3
Variation in harms and benefits of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer by socio-clinical risk factors: A rapid review.
前列腺癌前列腺特异性抗原筛查的危害与益处因社会临床风险因素而异:一项快速综述。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Feb 9;5(5):417-432. doi: 10.1002/bco2.326. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Results from 22 years of Followup in the Göteborg Randomized Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.哥德堡基于人群的前列腺癌随机筛查试验22年随访结果。
J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):292-300. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002696. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
5
Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.基于人群的前列腺癌临床显著程度筛查的随机试验——ProScreen:一项试点研究。
BJU Int. 2022 Aug;130(2):193-199. doi: 10.1111/bju.15683. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
6
Outcomes of prostate cancer screening among men using antidiabetic medication.使用抗糖尿病药物的男性前列腺癌筛查结果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86534-2.
7
Long-term health-related quality of life among men with prostate cancer in the Finnish randomized study of screening for prostate cancer.芬兰前列腺癌筛查随机研究中前列腺癌患者的长期健康相关生活质量。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(15):5643-5654. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3181. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
8
Survival and mortality of elderly men with localized prostate cancer managed with primary androgen deprivation therapy or by primary observation.采用雄激素剥夺疗法或主动观察治疗局限性前列腺癌的老年男性患者的生存和死亡率。
BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00593-7.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of PSA-based mass screening: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial combined with register data.基于 PSA 的大规模筛查的成本效益分析:一项随机对照试验与登记数据相结合的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 5;14(11):e0224479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224479. eCollection 2019.
10
The Impact of Design and Performance in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Differences Between ERSPC Centers.在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的设计和性能的影响:ERSPC 中心之间的差异。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 26.