Khan Zaraq, Zanfagnin Valentina, El-Nashar Sherif A, Famuyide Abimbola O, Daftary Gaurang S, Hopkins Matthew R
Laboratory of Translation Epigenetics in Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Laboratory of Translation Epigenetics in Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):478-484. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
To evaluate the risk factors, presentation, and outcomes in cases of abdominal wall endometriosis.
A case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
An academic medical center.
A total of 102 (34 cases and 68 controls) were included.
Surgical resection of abdominal wall endometriosis.
Cases underwent surgical excision for abdominal wall endometriosis at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2013. For each case, 2 controls were randomly selected from a list of women who had surgery in the same year with minimal (American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage I-II) endometriosis. A chart review was completed for variables of interest. Regression models were used to identify independent risk factors associated with abdominal wall endometriosis.
In 14 years, 2539 women had surgery for endometriosis at Mayo Clinic. Of these, only 34 (1.34%) had abdominal wall endometriosis. The mean age was 35.2 ± 5.9 years, and the median parity was 2 (range, 0-5). Clinical examination diagnosed abdominal wall endometriosis in 41% of cases, with the cesarean delivery scar being the most common site (59%). There was a strong correlation between the size of the lesion on clinical examination compared with the size of the pathology specimen (r = 0.74, p < .001). When compared with controls, cases had significantly higher parity and body mass index, more cyclic localized abdominal pain, less dysmenorrhea, longer duration from the start of symptoms to surgery, and more gynecologic surgeries for symptoms without cure. In the final multivariable model, cyclic localized abdominal pain, absence of dysmenorrhea, and previous laparotomy were independently associated with abdominal wall endometriosis with adjusted odds ratios of 10.6 (95% CI 1.85-104.4, p < .001), 12.4 (95% CI 1.64-147.1, p < .001), and 70.1 (95% CI 14.8-597.7, p < .001), respectively, with an area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87-0.98). After excision of the disease, repeat surgery was needed in 2 (5.9%) patients with a median time to recurrence of 50.5 (range, 36-65) months.
Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare but unique form of endometriosis. Careful history and clinical examination can provide accurate diagnosis and avoid unnecessary delay before surgical intervention. Localized cyclic abdominal pain with the absence of dysmenorrhea and a history of prior laparotomy are independent risk factors with very high accuracy for diagnosis.
评估腹壁子宫内膜异位症的危险因素、临床表现及预后。
病例对照研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。
一所学术医疗中心。
共纳入102例(34例病例和68例对照)。
腹壁子宫内膜异位症的手术切除。
2000年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间,病例在梅奥诊所接受腹壁子宫内膜异位症的手术切除。对于每例病例,从同年接受轻度(美国生殖医学学会I-II期)子宫内膜异位症手术的女性名单中随机选取2名对照。完成了对感兴趣变量的图表审查。使用回归模型确定与腹壁子宫内膜异位症相关的独立危险因素。
14年间,2539名女性在梅奥诊所接受了子宫内膜异位症手术。其中,仅34例(1.34%)患有腹壁子宫内膜异位症。平均年龄为35.2±5.9岁,中位产次为2次(范围0-5次)。41%的病例通过临床检查诊断为腹壁子宫内膜异位症,剖宫产瘢痕是最常见的部位(59%)。临床检查发现的病变大小与病理标本大小之间存在很强的相关性(r=0.74,p<.001)。与对照相比,病例的产次和体重指数显著更高,有更多周期性局部腹痛,痛经较少,从症状开始到手术的持续时间更长,且因症状未治愈而进行的妇科手术更多。在最终的多变量模型中,周期性局部腹痛、无痛经和既往剖腹手术与腹壁子宫内膜异位症独立相关,调整后的优势比分别为10.6(95%CI 1.85-104.4,p<.001)、12.4(95%CI 1.64-147.1,p<.001)和70.1(95%CI 14.8-597.7,p<.001),受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.94(95%CI,0.87-0.98)。疾病切除后,2例(5.9%)患者需要再次手术,复发的中位时间为50.5个月(范围36-65个月)。
腹壁子宫内膜异位症是一种罕见但独特的子宫内膜异位症形式。仔细的病史和临床检查可提供准确诊断,并避免手术干预前的不必要延迟。无痛经的局部周期性腹痛和既往剖腹手术史是诊断准确性非常高的独立危险因素。