Koran Mary Ellen, Stewart Samantha, Baker Jennifer C, Lipnik Andrew J, Banovac Fil, Omary Reed A, Brown Daniel B
Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Biomed Rep. 2016 Dec;5(6):745-748. doi: 10.3892/br.2016.799. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Resin Yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres have historically been infused using sterile water (HO). In 2013, recommendations expanded to allow delivery with 5% dextrose in water (DW). In this retrospective study, we hypothesized that DW would improve Y90 delivery with a lower incidence of stasis. We reviewed 190 resin Y90 infusions using HO (n=137) or DW (n=53). Y90 dosimetry was calculated using the body surface area method. Infusion was halted if intra-arterial stasis was fluoroscopically identified prior to clearing the vial. Differences between HO and DW groups were calculated for activity prescription, percentage of cases reaching stasis, and percentage delivery of prescribed activity using z- and t-test comparisons, with α=0.05. Thirty-one of 137 HO infusions developed stasis compared to 2 of 53 with DW (z=3.07, p=1.05E-03). DW also had a significantly higher prescribed activity than HO [28.2 millicuries (mCi) vs. 20.4 mCi, respectively; t=5.0, p=1.1E-6]. DW had a higher delivery percentage of the prescribed dose compared to HO (101.5 vs. 92.7%, respectively; t=3.8, p=1.92E-4). In conclusion, resin microsphere infusion utilizing DW has a significantly lower rate of stasis than HO and results in more complete dose delivery. DW is preferable to HO for resin microsphere infusion.
树脂钇-90(Y90)微球一直以来都使用无菌水(HO)进行注入。2013年,建议范围扩大到允许使用5%葡萄糖水溶液(DW)进行输送。在这项回顾性研究中,我们假设DW会改善Y90的输送,且淤滞发生率更低。我们回顾了190例使用HO(n = 137)或DW(n = 53)进行的树脂Y90注入。Y90剂量测定采用体表面积法。如果在清空药瓶前通过荧光镜检查发现动脉内淤滞,则停止注入。使用z检验和t检验比较计算HO组和DW组在活性处方、出现淤滞的病例百分比以及规定活性的输送百分比方面的差异,α = 0.05。137例使用HO的注入中有31例出现淤滞,而使用DW的53例中有2例出现淤滞(z = 3.07,p = 1.05E - 03)。DW的规定活性也显著高于HO[分别为28.2毫居里(mCi)和20.4 mCi;t = 5.0,p = 1.1E - 6]。与HO相比,DW的规定剂量输送百分比更高(分别为101.5%和92.7%;t = 3.8,p = 1.92E - 4)。总之,使用DW进行树脂微球注入的淤滞率明显低于HO,且能实现更完全的剂量输送。对于树脂微球注入,DW比HO更可取。