Suppr超能文献

早期霍奇金淋巴瘤受累淋巴结放射治疗(INRT)中观察者间勾画的不确定性:代表欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)淋巴瘤小组放疗委员会

Interobserver delineation uncertainty in involved-node radiation therapy (INRT) for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: on behalf of the Radiotherapy Committee of the EORTC lymphoma group.

作者信息

Aznar Marianne C, Girinsky Theodore, Berthelsen Anne Kiil, Aleman Berthe, Beijert Max, Hutchings Martin, Lievens Yolande, Meijnders Paul, Meidahl Petersen Peter, Schut Deborah, Maraldo Maja V, van der Maazen Richard, Specht Lena

机构信息

a Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark.

b Service de Radiothérapie Oncologique , Institut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2017 Apr;56(4):608-613. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1279750. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) the target volume nowadays consists of the volume of the originally involved nodes. Delineation of this volume on a post-chemotherapy CT-scan is challenging. We report on the interobserver variability in target volume definition and its impact on resulting treatment plans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two representative cases were selected (1: male, stage IB, localization: left axilla; 2: female, stage IIB, localizations: mediastinum and bilateral neck). Eight experienced observers individually defined the clinical target volume (CTV) using involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) as defined by the EORTC-GELA guidelines for the H10 trial. A consensus contour was generated and the standard deviation computed. We investigated the overlap between observer and consensus contour [Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC)] and the magnitude of gross deviations between the surfaces of the observer and consensus contour (Hausdorff distance). 3D-conformal (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were calculated for each contour in order to investigate the impact of interobserver variability on each treatment modality. Similar target coverage was enforced for all plans.

RESULTS

The median CTV was 120 cm (IQR: 95-173 cm) for Case 1, and 255 cm (IQR: 183-293 cm) for Case 2. DSC values were generally high (>0.7), and Hausdorff distances were about 30 mm. The SDs between all observer contours, providing an estimate of the systematic error associated with delineation uncertainty, ranged from 1.9 to 3.8 mm (median: 3.2 mm). Variations in mean dose resulting from different observer contours were small and were not higher in IMRT plans than in 3D-CRT plans.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed considerable differences in target volume delineation, but the systematic delineation uncertainty of around 3 mm is comparable to that reported in other tumour sites. This report is a first step towards calculating an evidence-based planning target volume margin for INRT in HL.

摘要

背景与目的

在早期经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)中,目前的靶区体积包括最初受累淋巴结的体积。在化疗后CT扫描上勾画该体积具有挑战性。我们报告了观察者间在靶区体积定义上的变异性及其对最终治疗计划的影响。

材料与方法

选择了两个具有代表性的病例(病例1:男性,IB期,部位:左腋窝;病例2:女性,IIB期,部位:纵隔和双侧颈部)。八位经验丰富的观察者根据欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织 - 淋巴瘤协作组(EORTC - GELA)H10试验指南中定义的受累淋巴结放疗(INRT),分别独立定义临床靶区体积(CTV)。生成了一个共识轮廓并计算了标准差。我们研究了观察者轮廓与共识轮廓之间的重叠情况[ Sørensen - Dice系数(DSC)]以及观察者轮廓与共识轮廓表面之间的总体偏差大小(豪斯多夫距离)。为每个轮廓计算了三维适形放疗(3D - CRT)和调强放疗(IMRT)计划,以研究观察者间变异性对每种治疗方式的影响。所有计划都强制实现相似的靶区覆盖。

结果

病例1的CTV中位数为120 cm³(四分位间距:95 - 173 cm³),病例2为255 cm³(四分位间距:183 - 293 cm³)。DSC值通常较高(>0.7),豪斯多夫距离约为30 mm。所有观察者轮廓之间的标准差,提供了与勾画不确定性相关的系统误差估计,范围为1.9至3.8 mm(中位数:3.2 mm)。不同观察者轮廓导致的平均剂量变化很小,并且在IMRT计划中并不比3D - CRT计划中更高。

结论

我们观察到靶区体积勾画存在相当大的差异,但约3 mm的系统勾画不确定性与其他肿瘤部位报告的情况相当。本报告是朝着为HL的INRT计算基于证据的计划靶区体积边界迈出的第一步。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验