• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体思维:临床医生应如何应对人口贩卖问题?

Groupthink: How Should Clinicians Respond to Human Trafficking?

作者信息

Cheshire William Polk

机构信息

Professor of neurology at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Jacksonville, Florida, where he chairs the Medical Ethics Committee and leads the Program in Professionalism & Values.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):91-97. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.msoc3-1701.

DOI:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.msoc3-1701
PMID:28107160
Abstract

Human trafficking is a pervasive problem that exceeds the capacity of social and organizational resources to restrain and for which guidelines are inadequate to assist medical professionals in responding to the special needs of victims when they present as patients. One obstacle to appropriate disagreement with an inadequate status quo is the lure of group cohesion. "Groupthink" is a social psychological phenomenon in which presumed group consensus prevails despite potentially adverse consequences. In the context of the medical response to human trafficking, groupthink may foster complacency, rationalize acquiescence with inaction on the basis of perceived futility, create an illusion of unanimity, and accommodate negative stereotyping. Despite these inhibiting influences, even in apparently futile situations, medical professionals have unique opportunities to be a force for good.

摘要

人口贩卖是一个普遍存在的问题,其严重程度超出了社会和组织资源的管控能力,而且现有的指导方针不足以帮助医疗专业人员应对受害者作为患者前来就医时的特殊需求。对不尽人意的现状提出恰当异议的一个障碍是群体凝聚力的诱惑。“群体思维”是一种社会心理现象,即尽管可能会产生不良后果,但假定的群体共识仍占上风。在应对人口贩卖的医疗情境中,群体思维可能会助长自满情绪,以认为徒劳无功为由使不作为的默许合理化,制造一致同意的假象,并容忍负面刻板印象。尽管存在这些阻碍性影响,但即使在看似徒劳无功的情况下,医疗专业人员也有独特的机会成为一股向善的力量。

相似文献

1
Groupthink: How Should Clinicians Respond to Human Trafficking?群体思维:临床医生应如何应对人口贩卖问题?
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):91-97. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.msoc3-1701.
2
Caring for the Trafficked Patient: Ethical Challenges and Recommendations for Health Care Professionals.关爱被贩卖患者:医疗保健专业人员面临的伦理挑战与建议
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):80-90. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.msoc2-1701.
3
Who is in Your Waiting Room? Health Care Professionals as Culturally Responsive and Trauma-Informed First Responders to Human Trafficking.
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):63-71. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.pfor2-1701.
4
Human Trafficking in Areas of Conflict: Health Care Professionals' Duty to Act.冲突地区的人口贩卖:医疗保健专业人员的行动义务。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):72-79. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.msoc1-1701.
5
Sex trafficking in Ireland from a health care perspective.从医疗保健视角看爱尔兰的性交易问题。
Ir Med J. 2014 Oct;107(9):270-2.
6
Mandatory Reporting of Human Trafficking: Potential Benefits and Risks of Harm.人口贩运的强制报告:潜在益处与伤害风险
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):54-62. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.pfor1-1701.
7
Human Trafficking: How Nurses Can Make a Difference.人口贩卖:护士如何发挥作用。
J Forensic Nurs. 2018 Apr/Jun;14(2):117-121. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000203.
8
Taking Up the Mantle of Human Trafficking Education: Who Should Be Responsible?承担人口贩卖教育的责任:谁应负责?
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.ecas4-1701.
9
HUMAN TRAFFICKING: HOW A JOINT TASK FORCE BETWEEN HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CAN ASSIST WITH IDENTIFYING VICTIMS AND PROSECUTING TRAFFICKERS.人口贩运:医疗服务提供者与执法部门之间的联合特遣部队如何协助识别受害者及起诉贩运者。
Health Matrix Clevel. 2016;26:433-73.
10
Commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of children in the United States.美国儿童商业性剥削和性贩卖问题。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2014 Oct;44(9):245-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review.医患护理中医疗专业团队的群体思维:范围综述。
Med Teach. 2022 Mar;44(3):309-318. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987404. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Caring for trafficked and unidentified patients in the EHR shadows: Shining a light by sharing the data.在电子健康记录的阴影下照顾被贩卖和身份不明的患者:通过共享数据来照亮。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 14;14(3):e0213766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213766. eCollection 2019.