Masiliūnas Rytis, Vitkutė Dalia, Stankevičius Edgaras, Matijošaitis Vaidas, Petrikonis Kęstutis
Department of Neurology, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškių Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania; Clinics of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Klinik Kirchheim, Kreiskliniken Esslingen, Kirchheim unter Teck, Germany.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2017;53(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
The aim of our study was to evaluate how response inhibition, set shifting, and complex executive function (represented by risky decision-making) are altered in chronic lower back pain patients.
A total of 29 patients with chronic lower back pain (CLBP >6 months) aged 49-69 years and 30 healthy volunteers matched for age, gender, and education were enrolled in a case-control study. The study was conducted in the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Panevėžys Regional Hospital, Lithuania. Pain was evaluated by the visual analog scale, Pakula Pain Questionnaire (Lithuanian analog of McGill Pain Questionnaire), and Fibromyalgia Tender Points Examination. A battery of neuropsychological tests used included Stroop Test Victoria version, Trail Making Test parts A and B, and Game of Dice Task (GDT).
CLBP patients did not score significantly worse in any examined neuropsychological tests. Response Inhibition correlated inversely with number of tender points in CLBP patients. GDT performance showed no significant difference in net score (number of safe minus risky decisions). Unexpectedly, both groups favored risky decisions.
We found no statistically significant difference in response inhibition, set shifting, or complex executive function between CLBP patients and healthy older adults. Moreover, a risky decision-making pattern found in the Lithuanian population may underscore the importance of cultural context when examining complex executive function. However, further studies are needed to prove this point.
我们研究的目的是评估慢性下背痛患者的反应抑制、任务转换以及复杂执行功能(以风险决策为代表)是如何改变的。
一项病例对照研究纳入了29名年龄在49 - 69岁之间的慢性下背痛患者(CLBP > 6个月)以及30名年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配的健康志愿者。该研究在立陶宛帕涅韦日斯地区医院的神经科和神经外科进行。通过视觉模拟量表、帕库拉疼痛问卷(立陶宛版的麦吉尔疼痛问卷)以及纤维肌痛压痛点检查来评估疼痛情况。所使用的一系列神经心理学测试包括维多利亚版斯特鲁普测试、连线测验A和B部分以及掷骰子任务(GDT)。
CLBP患者在任何一项所检查的神经心理学测试中得分均未显著更差。CLBP患者的反应抑制与压痛点数量呈负相关。GDT表现的净得分(安全决策数减去风险决策数)无显著差异。出乎意料的是,两组都倾向于风险决策。
我们发现CLBP患者与健康老年人在反应抑制、任务转换或复杂执行功能方面无统计学显著差异。此外,在立陶宛人群中发现的风险决策模式可能凸显了在研究复杂执行功能时文化背景的重要性。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这一点。