Suppr超能文献

两个药物致死数据源中死者特征缺乏重叠且存在巨大差异。挪威2007 - 2009年死因与警方登记记录的关联研究。

Lack of overlap and large discrepancies in the characteristics of the deceased in two sources of drug death. A linkage study of the Cause of Death and the Police Registries in Norway 2007-2009.

作者信息

Amundsen Ellen Johanna

机构信息

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, No-0403 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Mar;41:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.016. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Registries for drug deaths may include different persons and provide different characteristics of the deceased. The aim of this study was to establish whether a database of drug-induced deaths (Cause of Death Registry (CDR) using the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) definition and the Police registry of drug deaths) included the same persons and provided the same characteristics of the deceased and thus yielded the same information for establishing targeted prevention measures.

METHODS

Notifications from 2007 to 2009 were drawn from the CDR and the police registry of drug deaths and the unique Norwegian personal identification number was used to match the registrations.

RESULTS

The two sources of drug deaths yielded 1384 registrations, encompassing 929 individuals of whom only 49% were included in both registries. A large proportion of the deceased (40%) were not listed in the police registry. This group was older (mean age 43 years vs. 35 years); dependence and suicide were listed more often as cause of death (33% vs. 8%); and heroin was listed less often as the type of drug causing death (24% vs. 67%) than those included in both registries. In particular, among women not included in the police registry, the cause of death was identified with much greater frequency as pharmaceuticals with morphine or codeine (47% vs. 16%).

CONCLUSION

The large discrepancies in size, overlap, and characteristics of the deceased included in two sources of drug death imply that prevention measures based on the two sources will differ.

摘要

背景

药物致死登记可能涵盖不同人群,并提供死者的不同特征。本研究的目的是确定一个药物所致死亡数据库(使用欧洲药物和药物成瘾监测中心(EMCDDA)定义的死因登记处(CDR)以及警方药物致死登记处)是否包含相同人群,是否提供死者的相同特征,从而为制定有针对性的预防措施提供相同的信息。

方法

从CDR和警方药物致死登记处提取2007年至2009年的通报信息,并使用挪威唯一的个人身份识别号码来匹配登记信息。

结果

这两个药物致死信息来源共产生了1384条登记记录,涉及929个人,其中只有49%的人同时被两个登记处收录。很大一部分死者(40%)未被列入警方登记处。这一组年龄更大(平均年龄43岁对35岁);依赖和自杀作为死因列出的频率更高(33%对8%);与两个登记处都收录的人相比,海洛因作为导致死亡的毒品类型列出的频率更低(24%对67%)。特别是,在未被列入警方登记处的女性中,死因被认定为含吗啡或可待因药物的频率要高得多(47%对16%)。

结论

两个药物致死信息来源在规模、重叠情况以及所包含死者的特征方面存在巨大差异,这意味着基于这两个来源制定的预防措施会有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验