Hill Patsy-Anne, Panteleimonitis Sofoklis, McKay Graham, Watson Carol, Prach Andre, Macdonald Angus
1 Senior Staff Nurse, Endoscopy Suite, Monklands District General Hospital.
2 Surgical Trainee, Monklands District General Hospital, UK.
Scott Med J. 2017 Feb;62(1):11-15. doi: 10.1177/0036933017690465. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
Background and aims Sublingual glyceryl trinitrate has been used as an aid to cannulate the Sphincter of Oddi during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Its role in terminal ileal intubation during colonoscopy is unknown. This study examines the role of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate in terminal ileal intubation during colonoscopy. Methods A triple-blind randomized controlled trial comparing sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (800 µg) vs. placebo (saline) in relation to terminal ileal intubation during colonoscopy was performed. Following caecal intubation, participants received sublingual glyceryl trinitrate/placebo followed by a 2-min observation period before intubation was attempted. Data on time to intubate the terminal ileum and intubation rate were collected. Results A total of 110 patients (age: 58 years (18-75)) were recruited and randomised as per protocol: 54 received sublingual glyceryl trinitrate. Terminal ileal intubation was successful in all patients receiving sublingual glyceryl trinitrate and in 53 (94.6%) of those receiving saline ( p = 0.243: Fischer's exact). The median time taken for ileal intubation after application of spray was 72.5 (7-900) s in the glyceryl trinitrate group compared with 125 (5-900) s in the placebo group ( p = 0.150: Mann-Whitney). There were no major adverse events reported in either group. Conclusions Terminal ileal intubation rates and timing were very good in both groups. Routine sublingual glyceryl trinitrate was not proven to be beneficial in improving terminal ileal intubation or intubation success rates in the hands of experienced colonoscopists. However, trends in this small study might suggest that glyceryl trinitrate could be useful in the hands of less experienced colonoscopists or in difficult terminal ileal intubation cases.
背景与目的 舌下含服硝酸甘油已被用于在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中辅助插管至Oddi括约肌。其在结肠镜检查时末端回肠插管中的作用尚不清楚。本研究探讨舌下含服硝酸甘油在结肠镜检查时末端回肠插管中的作用。方法 进行一项三盲随机对照试验,比较结肠镜检查时舌下含服硝酸甘油(800μg)与安慰剂(生理盐水)在末端回肠插管方面的效果。盲肠插管后,参与者接受舌下含服硝酸甘油/安慰剂,随后在尝试插管前有2分钟的观察期。收集到达末端回肠插管的时间和插管率数据。结果 共招募了110名患者(年龄:58岁(18 - 75岁))并按方案进行随机分组:54名接受舌下含服硝酸甘油。所有接受舌下含服硝酸甘油的患者以及53名(94.6%)接受生理盐水的患者末端回肠插管成功(p = 0.243:Fisher精确检验)。硝酸甘油组喷雾应用后回肠插管的中位时间为72.5(7 - 900)秒,而安慰剂组为125(5 - 900)秒(p = 0.150:Mann - Whitney检验)。两组均未报告重大不良事件。结论 两组的末端回肠插管率和时间都非常好。在经验丰富的结肠镜检查医生手中,常规舌下含服硝酸甘油未被证明有助于提高末端回肠插管或插管成功率。然而,这项小型研究中的趋势可能表明,硝酸甘油在经验较少的结肠镜检查医生手中或在困难的末端回肠插管病例中可能有用。