Driver Brian E, McGill John W
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):635-639. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.027. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
Angioedema is an uncommon but important cause of airway obstruction. Emergency airway management of angioedema is difficult. We seek to describe the course and outcomes of emergency airway management for severe angioedema in our institution.
We performed a retrospective, observational study of all intubations for angioedema performed in an urban academic emergency department (ED) between November 2007 and June 2015. We performed a structured review of video recordings of each intubation. We identified the methods of airway management, the success of each method, and the outcomes and complications of the effort.
We identified 52 patients with angioedema who were intubated in the ED; 7 were excluded because of missing videos, leaving 45 patients in the analysis. Median time from arrival to the ED to the first intubation attempt was 33 minutes (interquartile range 17 to 79 minutes). Nasotracheal intubation was the most common first method (33/45; 73%), followed by video laryngoscopy (7/45; 16%). Two patients required attempts at more invasive airway procedures (retrograde intubation and cricothyrotomy). The intubating laryngeal mask airway was used as a rescue method 5 times after failure of multiple methods, with successful oxygenation, ventilation, and intubation through the laryngeal mask airway in all 5 patients. All patients were successfully intubated.
In this series of ED patients who were intubated because of angioedema, emergency physicians used a range of methods to successfully manage the airway. These observations provide key lessons for the emergency airway management of these critical patients.
血管性水肿是气道梗阻的一个不常见但重要的原因。血管性水肿的紧急气道管理具有挑战性。我们旨在描述我院严重血管性水肿紧急气道管理的过程及结果。
我们对2007年11月至2015年6月在一家城市学术急诊科(ED)进行的所有因血管性水肿而行气管插管的病例进行了回顾性观察研究。我们对每次插管的视频记录进行了结构化审查。我们确定了气道管理方法、每种方法的成功率以及该过程的结果和并发症。
我们确定了52例在急诊科因血管性水肿而行气管插管的患者;7例因视频缺失被排除,最终纳入分析的患者有45例。从到达急诊科至首次插管尝试的中位时间为33分钟(四分位间距17至79分钟)。鼻气管插管是最常用的首次插管方法(33/45;73%),其次是视频喉镜检查(7/45;16%)。2例患者需要尝试更具侵入性的气道操作(逆行插管和环甲膜切开术)。在多种方法失败后,喉罩气道被用作挽救方法5次,所有5例患者通过喉罩气道成功实现了给氧、通气和插管。所有患者均成功插管。
在这组因血管性水肿而行气管插管的急诊科患者中,急诊医生使用多种方法成功地管理了气道。这些观察结果为这些重症患者的紧急气道管理提供了关键经验。