• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“它对谁有效?”巴西学生中基于学校的干预对潜在身体活动决定因素影响的调节因素

"For whom was it effective?" Moderators of the effect of a school-based intervention on potential physical activity determinants among Brazilian students.

作者信息

Barbosa Filho Valter Cordeiro, da Silva Kelly Samara, Mota Jorge, Vieira Neiva Francenely Cunha, Gubert Fabiane do Amaral, Lopes Adair da Silva

机构信息

Research Centre in Physical Activity and Health, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil; Research Centre in Physical Activity and Health in School, Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil; Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Research Centre in Physical Activity and Health, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2017 Apr;97:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.007
PMID:28111095
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Knowledge about the effects of school-based interventions on modifiable physical activity (PA) determinants (e.g., social support), and whether the intervention effect differs according to students' characteristics (e.g., age and gender) are relevant PA promotion topics. This study aims to answer these topics among Brazilian students. This cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 548 students in the intervention group and 537 in the control group (51.5% of boys; aged 11-18years). The four-month intervention included strategies focused on training teachers, opportunities for PA in the school environment, and health education. Potential PA determinants (attitude, self-efficacy, support of friends, parents, and teachers, perceived neighborhood environment and PA facilities in school) and moderators (gender, age, socioeconomic status (SES), and PA level at baseline) were assessed using self-reported instrument. Height and weight were measured to estimate the students' body mass index (BMI) status. Generalized linear models were used. In general, there was a significant and positive intervention effect for attitude, support of friends and teachers for PA, as well as PA facilities in school; effect size was 0.29, 0.24, 0.34, and 0.29, respectively (P<0.05). Age (support of friends, parents and teachers, and PA facilities in school), SES (support of friends and PA facilities in school), and BMI status (support of friends) were moderators of the intervention effect on some outcomes. In conclusion, the intervention improved potential PA determinants, but some changes occurred differently according to students' characteristics. These findings should be considered in PA policies in the school context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.govNCT02439827.

摘要

未标注

了解基于学校的干预措施对可改变的身体活动(PA)决定因素(如社会支持)的影响,以及干预效果是否因学生特征(如年龄和性别)而异,是相关的PA促进主题。本研究旨在回答巴西学生中的这些主题。这项整群随机对照试验对干预组的548名学生和对照组的537名学生进行(男生占51.5%;年龄11 - 18岁)。为期四个月的干预措施包括侧重于培训教师、在学校环境中进行PA的机会以及健康教育的策略。使用自我报告工具评估潜在的PA决定因素(态度、自我效能、朋友、父母和教师的支持、感知的邻里环境和学校的PA设施)和调节因素(性别、年龄、社会经济地位(SES)以及基线时的PA水平)。测量身高和体重以估计学生的体重指数(BMI)状况。使用广义线性模型。总体而言,干预对态度、朋友和教师对PA的支持以及学校的PA设施有显著的积极影响;效应大小分别为0.29、0.24、0.34和0.29(P<0.05)。年龄(朋友、父母和教师的支持以及学校的PA设施)、SES(朋友的支持和学校的PA设施)和BMI状况(朋友的支持)是干预对某些结果影响的调节因素。总之,干预改善了潜在的PA决定因素,但根据学生特征,一些变化有所不同。在学校背景下的PA政策中应考虑这些发现。

试验注册

本研究在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT02439827。

相似文献

1
"For whom was it effective?" Moderators of the effect of a school-based intervention on potential physical activity determinants among Brazilian students.“它对谁有效?”巴西学生中基于学校的干预对潜在身体活动决定因素影响的调节因素
Prev Med. 2017 Apr;97:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
2
Psychosocial mediators of screen time reduction after an intervention for students from schools in vulnerable areas: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.干预脆弱地区学校学生的屏幕时间后,心理社会因素的中介作用:一项聚类随机对照试验。
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Mar;23(3):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
3
Rationale and methods of a cluster-randomized controlled trial to promote active and healthy lifestyles among Brazilian students: the "Fortaleça sua Saúde" program.一项在巴西学生中促进积极健康生活方式的整群随机对照试验的原理与方法:“增强你的健康”计划
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 7;15:1212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2543-2.
4
Psychosocial mediators and moderators of a school-based physical activity intervention among Brazilian adolescents.基于学校的身体活动干预对巴西青少年的心理社会中介和调节因素。
J Sports Sci. 2024 Jan;42(1):17-24. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2319455. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
A Physical Activity Intervention for Brazilian Students From Low Human Development Index Areas: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.针对来自人类发展指数较低地区的巴西学生的体育活动干预:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Nov;13(11):1174-1182. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0113. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
6
Mid-way and post-intervention effects on potential determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior, results of the HEIA study - a multi-component school-based randomized trial.中期和干预后对身体活动和久坐行为潜在决定因素的影响,HEIA 研究的结果-一项多组分基于学校的随机试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 May 29;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-63.
7
A school-based intervention program in promoting leisure-time physical activity: trial protocol.促进课余体力活动的基于学校的干预计划:试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5320-1.
8
What helps children to move more at school recess and lunchtime? Mid-intervention results from Transform-Us! cluster-randomised controlled trial.什么能帮助孩子在课间休息和午餐时间多运动?Transform-Us!的中期干预结果:集群随机对照试验。
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):271-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092466. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Initial Outcomes of a Participatory-Based, Competency-Building Approach to Increasing Physical Education Teachers' Physical Activity Promotion and Students' Physical Activity: A Pilot Study.基于参与式的、能力建设方法对提高体育教师体育活动促进和学生体育活动的初步效果:一项试点研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Jun;45(3):359-370. doi: 10.1177/1090198117731600. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
Using physical education to promote out-of school physical activity in lower secondary school students - a randomized controlled trial protocol.利用体育教育促进初中生校外体育活动——一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6478-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Between Perceived Parental and Michigan Middle-School Students' Lifestyle Characteristics.密歇根州中学生所感知到的父母因素与生活方式特征之间的关联
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Aug 16:15598276241268316. doi: 10.1177/15598276241268316.
2
Pathways of physical activity behavior after an intervention with students from vulnerable areas: a cluster randomized controlled trial based on a socioecological approach.基于社会生态学方法的脆弱地区学生干预后身体活动行为途径:一项群组随机对照试验。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Sep 27;40(9):e00138023. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN138023. eCollection 2024.
3
Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 12 to 18 years old.
预防 12 至 18 岁儿童肥胖的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 20;5(5):CD015330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015330.pub2.
4
Effectiveness of Intervention Strategies to Increase Adolescents' Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Time in Secondary School Settings, Including Factors Related to Implementation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中学环境中增加青少年身体活动和减少久坐时间的干预策略的有效性,包括与实施相关的因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Sports Med Open. 2024 Mar 13;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00688-7.
5
Primary-level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of well-being in low- and middle-income countries.初级卫生保健和社区工作者干预措施,以预防中低收入国家的精神障碍和促进福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 24;10(10):CD014722. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014722.pub2.
6
School environments and obesity: a systematic review of interventions and policies among school-age students in Latin America and the Caribbean.学校环境与肥胖:拉丁美洲和加勒比地区学龄儿童相关干预措施和政策的系统评价。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2023 Jan;47(1):5-16. doi: 10.1038/s41366-022-01226-9. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
8
Scoping Review on Interventions for Physical Activity and Physical Literacy Components in Brazilian School-Aged Children and Adolescents.巴西学龄儿童和青少年身体活动和身体素养干预措施的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;18(16):8349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168349.
9
Childcare Center Characteristics Moderate the Effects of a Physical Activity Intervention.儿童保健中心特征可调节身体活动干预的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 22;17(1):101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010101.
10
Interventions for preventing obesity in children.儿童肥胖预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 23;7(7):CD001871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub4.