Suppr超能文献

制定基于医院的慢性肾脏病患者外周静脉保留中心静脉通路策略:12年经验

Institution of a Hospital-Based Central Venous Access Policy for Peripheral Vein Preservation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A 12-Year Experience.

作者信息

Chick Jeffrey Forris Beecham, Reddy Shilpa N, Yam Benjamin L, Kobrin Sidney, Trerotola Scott O

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Division of Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Radiology and Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Radiology and Division of Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Radiology Associates of the Main Line and Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Main Line Health System, Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Mar;28(3):392-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the implementation of nursing-based venous access team (VAT) and standardized interventional radiology (IR) protocols in accordance with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines to provide central venous access while preserving peripheral veins in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Review of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and small-bore central catheter (SBCC) referral and placement data from VAT and IR databases was conducted over a 12-year period. SBCC referral was automatic for patients with creatinine levels ≥ 3 mg/dL or a renal transplant regardless of creatinine level unless dialysis was not planned. All SBCC insertions, regardless of referral source, were identified and reviewed, and SBCC placements prompted by K/DOQI PICC contraindication were identified. Catheter types, indications, access sites, technical success, and complications were ascertained.

RESULTS

A total of 35,781 requests for PICC placement were made to the VAT; 1,889 (5%) were referred to IR for SBCC placement per institutional policy, and 2,200 SBCCs were attempted or newly placed during this period, 1,879 (85%) based on K/DOQI contraindications. Primary indication for SBCC placement was antibiotic therapy (59%). Access sites included right internal jugular vein (IJV) (70%), left IJV (24%), right external jugular vein (EJV) (3%), left EJV (2%), right common femoral vein (CFV) (0.3%), and left CFV (0.2%). Technical success rate of SBCC insertion was 99%. Six minor (0.3%) and three major (0.1%) complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Automatic referral for SBCC placement in patients with CKD via VAT and IR protocols may eliminate PICC placement and thereby protect peripheral veins needed for hemodialysis. SBCC placement has high technical success and low complication rates.

摘要

目的

描述根据肾脏疾病预后质量倡议(K/DOQI)指南实施基于护理的静脉通路团队(VAT)和标准化介入放射学(IR)方案,以便在保护慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者外周静脉的同时提供中心静脉通路。

材料与方法

对VAT和IR数据库中12年期间外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)和小口径中心静脉导管(SBCC)的转诊及置入数据进行回顾。对于肌酐水平≥3mg/dL的患者或肾移植患者,无论肌酐水平如何,除非未计划进行透析,SBCC转诊均为自动进行。识别并回顾所有SBCC置入情况,无论转诊来源如何,并确定由K/DOQI PICC禁忌证引发的SBCC置入情况。确定导管类型、适应证、穿刺部位、技术成功率及并发症情况。

结果

VAT共收到35781例PICC置入申请;根据机构政策,1889例(5%)被转诊至IR进行SBCC置入,在此期间共尝试或新置入2200根SBCC,其中1879例(85%)基于K/DOQI禁忌证。SBCC置入的主要适应证为抗生素治疗(59%)。穿刺部位包括右颈内静脉(IJV)(70%)、左颈内静脉(24%)、右颈外静脉(EJV)(3%)、左颈外静脉(2%)、右股总静脉(CFV)(0.3%)和左股总静脉(0.2%)。SBCC置入的技术成功率为99%。发生6例轻微并发症(0.3%)和3例严重并发症(0.1%)。

结论

通过VAT和IR方案对CKD患者自动转诊进行SBCC置入,可避免PICC置入,从而保护血液透析所需的外周静脉。SBCC置入技术成功率高,并发症发生率低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验