Suppr超能文献

超声引导下新生儿和婴儿下肢中心静脉置管及尖端位置确认与传统置管的比较

US-guided placement and tip position confirmation for lower-extremity central venous access in neonates and infants with comparison versus conventional insertion.

作者信息

Gaballah Marian, Krishnamurthy Ganesh, Keller Marc S, McIntosh Adeka, Munson David A, Cahill Anne Marie

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Apr;25(4):548-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.003.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe experience with the use of ultrasound (US)-guided placement and tip position confirmation for direct saphenous and single-incision tunneled femoral noncuffed central venous catheters (CVCs) placed in neonates and infants at the bedside.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of the interventional radiology (IR) database and electronic medical records was performed for 68 neonates and infants who received a CVC at the bedside and for 70 age- and weight-matched patients with CVCs placed in the IR suite between 2007 and 2012. Technical success, complications, and outcomes of CVCs placed at the bedside were compared with those in an age- and weight-matched sample of children with CVCs placed in the IR suite.

RESULTS

A total of 150 primary insertions were performed, with a technical success rate of 100%. Total catheter lives for CVCs placed at the bedside and in the IR suite were 2,030 catheter-days (mean, 27.1 d) and 2,043 catheter-days (mean, 27.2 d), respectively. No significant difference was appreciated between intraprocedural complications, mechanical complications (bedside, 1.53 per 100 catheter-days; IR, 1.76 per 100 catheter-days), or infectious complications (bedside, 0.39 per 100 catheter-days; IR, 0.34 per 100 catheter-days) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided placement and tip position confirmation of lower-extremity CVCs at bedside for critically ill neonates and infants is a safe and feasible method for central venous access, with similar complications and catheter outcomes in comparison with CVCs placed by using fluoroscopic guidance in the IR suite.

摘要

目的

描述在床边对新生儿和婴儿进行超声(US)引导下大隐静脉及单切口隧道式股静脉非带袖套中心静脉导管(CVC)置入及尖端位置确认的经验。

材料与方法

对介入放射学(IR)数据库和电子病历进行回顾性分析,纳入2007年至2012年间在床边接受CVC置入的68例新生儿和婴儿,以及70例年龄和体重匹配、在IR室置入CVC的患者。将床边置入CVC的技术成功率、并发症及结局与在IR室置入CVC的年龄和体重匹配儿童样本进行比较。

结果

共进行了150次初次置入,技术成功率为100%。床边置入CVC和在IR室置入CVC的导管总使用天数分别为2030导管日(平均27.1天)和2043导管日(平均27.2天)。两组之间在操作过程中的并发症、机械并发症(床边,每100导管日1.53例;IR室每100导管日1.76例)或感染并发症(床边,每100导管日0.39例;IR室每100导管日0.34例)方面均无显著差异。

结论

对于危重新生儿和婴儿,在床边进行超声引导下下肢CVC置入及尖端位置确认是一种安全可行的中心静脉通路建立方法,与在IR室使用荧光透视引导置入CVC相比,并发症及导管结局相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验