英国法律中生命的价值：备受尊崇但非神圣不可侵犯？
The value of life in English law: revered but not sacred?
作者信息
Heywood Rob, Mullock Alexandra
机构信息
UEA Law School.
University of Manchester.
出版信息
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2016 Dec;36(4):658-682. doi: 10.1111/lest.12131. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
Abstract
sanctity inviolability , . , , reverence for life, . reverence . reverence .
摘要
神圣不可侵犯性，……，对生命的敬畏，……。敬畏。敬畏。
相似文献
1
The value of life in English law: revered but not sacred?英国法律中生命的价值：备受尊崇但非神圣不可侵犯？
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2016 Dec;36(4):658-682. doi: 10.1111/lest.12131. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
2
Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the presumption in favour of the maintenance of life is legally robust.对持续性意识障碍患者停止治疗：维持生命的推定在法律上是强有力的。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb;47(2):119-120. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106280. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
The sanctity of life as a sacred value.生命的神圣性作为一种神圣的价值观。
Bioethics. 2023 Jan;37(1):32-39. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13094. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Has the sanctity of life law 'gone too far'?: analysis of the sanctity of life doctrine and English case law shows that the sanctity of life law has not 'gone too far'.生命神圣法则是否“走得太远”？：对生命神圣教义和英国判例法的分析表明，生命神圣法则并未“走得太远”。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2014 Feb 22;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-9-5.
5
An Unholy Mess: Why 'The Sanctity of Life Principle' Should Be Jettisoned.一团糟：为何应摒弃“生命神圣原则”
New Bioeth. 2016 Nov;22(3):185-201. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2016.1238649.
6
Sanctity of life--are some lives more sacred than others?生命的神圣性——有些生命比其他生命更神圣吗？
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2002 Sep;22(3):377-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121x.2002.tb00198.x.
7
It is never lawful or ethical to withdraw life-sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.从有意识障碍延长的患者身上撤回生命维持治疗，这绝不是合法或合乎道德的。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Apr;45(4):265-270. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105250. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the wrong answer is what the wrong question begets.从持续性意识障碍患者身上撤下治疗：错误的问题会产生错误的答案。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):561-562. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106063. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
Overriding advance refusals of life-sustaining medical treatment.
Med Law. 2006 Dec;25(4):647-61.
10
Problems with claims that sanctity leads to 'pro-life' law, and reasons for doubting it to be a convincing 'middle way'.
Med Law. 2008 Mar;27(1):203-13.
本文引用的文献
1
Law in everyday life and death: a socio-legal study of chronic disorders of consciousness.日常生活与死亡中的法律：对慢性意识障碍的社会法律研究
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2015 Mar;35(1):55-74. doi: 10.1111/lest.12042.
2
Voices of discontent? Conscience, compromise, and assisted dying.不满之声？良知、妥协与协助死亡。
Med Law Rev. 2015 Spring;23(2):242-62. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv008. Epub 2015 May 8.
3
Unbearable suffering and requests for euthanasia prospectively studied in end-of-life cancer patients in primary care.对初级保健中临终癌症患者难以忍受的痛苦和安乐死请求进行前瞻性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Dec 23;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-62. eCollection 2014.
4
Moving on from bland: the evolution of the law and minimally conscious patients.告别平淡：法律与最低意识状态患者的演变
Med Law Rev. 2014 Fall;22(4):548-71. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu003. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
The 'window of opportunity' for death after severe brain injury: family experiences.严重脑损伤后死亡的“机会之窗”：家庭体验。
Sociol Health Illn. 2013 Sep;35(7):1095-112. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12020. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
6
Best interests and the sanctity of life after W v M.威诉马案之后的最佳利益与生命神圣性
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):553-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100907. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
7
Deciding the fate of a minimally conscious patient: an unsatisfactory balancing act?: W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam).判定最低意识状态患者的命运：一场不尽人意的权衡之举？：W诉M及其他人[2011]英国高等法院家事法庭第2443号判决（家事法庭）
Med Law Rev. 2012 Summer;20(3):460-9. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fws017. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
8
Assisted dying and the context of debate: 'medical law' versus 'end-of-life law'.安乐死与辩论背景：“医疗法”与“临终法”
Med Law Rev. 2010 Winter;18(4):541-63. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwq028.
9
Reasons why people in Switzerland seek assisted suicide: the view of patients and physicians.瑞士人寻求协助自杀的原因：患者和医生的观点。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2009 Jun 13;139(23-24):333-8. doi: 10.4414/smw.2009.12614.
10
Dignity: two riddles and four concepts.尊严：两个谜题与四个概念。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2008 Spring;17(2):230-8. doi: 10.1017/S0963180108080262.
Zotero 插件