Alguacil-Diego Isabel M, de-la-Torre-Domingo Carlos, López-Román Antonio, Miangolarra-Page Juan Carlos, Molina-Rueda Francisco
a Motion Analysis, Ergonomics, Biomechanics and Motor Control Laboratory (LAMBECOM), Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences , Rey Juan Carlos University , Madrid , Spain.
b Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences , Alfonso X El Sabio University , Madrid , Spain.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Apr;40(7):806-812. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1276975. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
To report the immediate and prolonged (one week) effects of elastic bandage (EB) on balance control in subjects with chronic ankle instability.
Twenty-eight individuals successfully completed the study protocol, of whom 14 were randomly assigned to the EB group (7 men, 7 women) and 14 were assigned to the non-standardised tape (NST) group (9 men, 5 women). To objectively measure postural sway we used computerised dynamic posturography (CDP) with sensory organisation test (SOT) and unilateral stance (US) test. We analysed the following SOT parameters: the composite SOT score, the composite SOT strategy and the SOT condition 2 and its strategy. In addition, we studied the centre of gravity (COG) sway velocity with open eyes and close eyes during the US test.
Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect for time in composite SOT score (F= 34.98; p= <0.01), composite SOT strategy (F= 12.082; p= 0.02), and COG sway with open eyes (F= 3.382; p= 0.039) in EB group and NST group. Therefore, there were improvements in balance control after bandage applications (defined as better scores in SOT parameters and decreased COG sway in US test). However, no differences between groups were observed in the most relevant parameters.
This study did not observe differences between EB and NST during the follow-up in the majority of measurements. Several outcome measures for SOT and US tests improved in both groups immediately after bandage applications and after one week of use. EB of the ankle joint has no advantage as compared to the non-standardised tape. Implications for rehabilitation Elastic bandage (EB) of the ankle joint has no advantage as compared to the non-standardised tape. The effects of the bandages could be due to a greater subjective sense of security. It is important to be prudent with the use of bandage, since a greater sense of safety could also bring with it a greater risk of injury. The application of the bandage on subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) should be prolonged and used alongside other physiotherapy treatments.
报告弹性绷带(EB)对慢性踝关节不稳患者平衡控制的即时和长期(一周)影响。
28名个体成功完成研究方案,其中14人被随机分配至EB组(7名男性,7名女性),14人被分配至非标准化胶带(NST)组(9名男性,5名女性)。为客观测量姿势摆动,我们使用了带有感觉组织测试(SOT)和单腿站立(US)测试的计算机化动态姿势描记法(CDP)。我们分析了以下SOT参数:综合SOT评分、综合SOT策略以及SOT条件2及其策略。此外,我们研究了US测试期间睁眼和闭眼时的重心(COG)摆动速度。
重复测量方差分析显示,EB组和NST组在综合SOT评分(F = 34.98;p = <0.01)、综合SOT策略(F = 12.082;p = 0.02)以及睁眼时的COG摆动(F = 3.382;p = 0.039)方面,时间因素具有显著影响。因此,绷带应用后平衡控制有所改善(定义为SOT参数得分更高且US测试中COG摆动减少)。然而,在最相关的参数方面未观察到组间差异。
本研究在随访期间的大多数测量中未观察到EB和NST之间的差异。绷带应用后即刻以及使用一周后,两组的SOT和US测试的多项结果指标均有所改善。与非标准化胶带相比,踝关节的弹性绷带并无优势。康复意义与非标准化胶带相比,踝关节的弹性绷带并无优势。绷带的效果可能归因于更强的主观安全感。谨慎使用绷带很重要,因为更强的安全感也可能带来更大的受伤风险。对于慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者,绷带的应用应延长,并与其他物理治疗方法一起使用。